Evidence of ostarine cross-contamination via sweat in 2 athletes sharing the same neoprene hamstring sleeves. An original situation of drug transfer where the anti-doping rule violation was suspended by the sport authorities

Clin Chim Acta. 2024 Apr 24:119688. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2024.119688. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTThe presence of ostarine, a selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) in an athlete's sample constitutes one of the most frequent anti-doping rules violation. It is possible to challenge this violation but it is the athlete who has to demonstrate he / she is innocent. The conditions to evidence no fault or negligence are mostly based on 2 points: 1. the athlete or his/her legal representative must present verified circumstances of contamination and the source of contamination must be identified; and 2. there must be verified claims by the athlete about the fact that he / she did not knowingly take the prohibited substance, i.e. that the violation was not intentional. During a 2-weeks period, a male athlete tested two times positive for ostarine in urine (<0.1 ng/ml) and he challenged these results. His hair and nail tests returned negative (LOQ at 0.5 pg/mg). He admitted using two neoprene hamstring sleeves of another athlete who confessed abusing ostarine. This was confirmed in his hair (190 pg/mg), his fingernail clippings (780 pg/mg) and his toenail clippings (45 pg/mg). To document the presence of ostarine in the hamstring sleeves and therefore possible drug transfer, the hamstring sleeves were analysed. Ostarine was identified in 12 different selected pieces (about 1 g) of the sleeves at concentrations ranging from 3 to 142 pg/g. Sport authorities (USADA) agreed that t...
Source: International Journal of Clinical Chemistry - Category: Chemistry Authors: Source Type: research