Comparing the outcomes and costs of cardiac monitoring with implantable loop recorders and mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry following stroke using real-world evidence
Conclusion: The use of MCOT versus ILR as the primary monitor following IS was associated with significant decreases in readmission, lower costs for the initial IS and total care over the next 18 months, significantly lower mortality for patients with complications and comorbidities at the index stroke, and a trend toward improved survival across all patients.PMID:38602503 | DOI:10.57264/cer-2024-0008
Source: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research - Category: General Medicine Authors: Vincent Norlock Reynaldo Vazquez Alexandria Dunn Christian Siegfried Manish Wadhwa Goran Medic Source Type: research
More News: Atrial Fibrillation | Databases & Libraries | General Medicine | Healthcare Costs | Ischemic Stroke | Statistics | Stroke