Suffering in Animal Research: The Need for Limits and the Possibility of Compensation

Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2022;32(3):297-311. doi: 10.1353/ken.2022.0019.ABSTRACTGuidelines and regulations for medical research recognize that the experiences of humans and animals both matter morally. They thus set a presumption against harming research subjects, whether humans or animals, and mandate that the harms subjects experience should be the minimal necessary for achieving the scientific aims of the study. Beyond this, guidelines and regulations place upper limits on the extent to which human, but not animal, subjects may be harmed. They also mandate that human, but not animal, subjects should be compensated for the harms they experience. In this article, I argue that this common approach to regulating medical research is mistaken. In particular, there are upper limits on the extent to which animals may ethically be harmed in order to collect data to benefit others, and there are moral reasons to compensate them for the harms they experience. I conclude that guidelines and regulations for research with animals should be revised accordingly.PMID:36341598 | PMC:PMC10103024 | DOI:10.1353/ken.2022.0019
Source: Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal - Category: Medical Ethics Authors: Source Type: research