Response to Editorial Commentary Regarding ‘A multi-institutional European comparative study of open versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in children with high grade (IV-V) vesicoureteral reflux?’

I refer to the ‘Editorial Commentary’ regarding our article entitled, ‘A multi-institutional European comparative study of open versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in children with high grade (IV-V) vesicoureteral reflux’ [1]. The Author of the commentary criticizes the criteria of success rate, affirming that some outcomes are more related to preferences in techniques of the surgeons (REF of the commentary in press).
Source: Journal of Pediatric Urology - Category: Urology & Nephrology Authors: Tags: Letter to the Editor Source Type: research