Response to Editorial Commentary Regarding ‘A multi-institutional European comparative study of open versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in children with high grade (IV-V) vesicoureteral reflux?’
I refer to the ‘Editorial Commentary’ regarding our article entitled, ‘A multi-institutional European comparative study of open versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in children with high grade (IV-V) vesicoureteral reflux’ [1]. The Author of the commentary criticizes the criteria of success rate, affirming that some outcomes are more related to preferences in techniques of the surgeons (REF of the commentary in press).
Source: Journal of Pediatric Urology - Category: Urology & Nephrology Authors: Simone Sforza, Beatriz Ba ñuelos Marco, Bernhard Haid, Numan Baydilli, Muhammet Irfan Donmez, Anne-Françoise Spinoit, Irene Paraboschi, Lorenzo Masieri, Lukas Steinkellner, Yusuf Ilker Comez, Rianne J.M. Lammers, Lisette Aimée ‘t Hoen, Fardod O’Kel Tags: Letter to the Editor Source Type: research
More News: Children | Laparoscopy | Pediatrics | Study | Ureter and Renal Pelvis Cancer | Urology & Nephrology