• Filter By:
• Specialty
• Source
• Condition
• Cancer
• Infectious Disease
• Drug
• Training
• Management
• Procedure
• Therapy
• Vaccine
• Nutrition
• Country

Cost-Effectiveness of Left Atrial Appendage Closure With the WATCHMAN Device Compared With Warfarin or Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants for Secondary Prevention in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Clinical Sciences
Conclusions—Upfront procedure costs initially make LAAC higher cost than warfarin and the non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, but within 10 years, LAAC delivers more quality-adjusted life years and has lower total costs, making LAAC the most cost-effective treatment strategy for secondary prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation.
Source: Stroke - May 25, 2018 Category: Neurology Authors: Vivek Y. Reddy, Ronald L. Akehurst, Stacey L. Amorosi, Meghan B. Gavaghan, Deanna S. Hertz, David R. Holmes Jr Tags: Atrial Fibrillation, Cost-Effectiveness Original Contributions Source Type: research

Anticoagulation Use and Clinical Outcomes After Major Bleeding on Dabigatran or Warfarin in Atrial Fibrillation Clinical Sciences
Conclusions—Dabigatran was associated with a superior benefit/risk ratio than warfarin and anticoagulation discontinuation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation patients who have survived a major bleed.
Source: Stroke - December 22, 2016 Category: Neurology Authors: Inmaculada Hernandez, Yuting Zhang, Maria M. Brooks, Paul K.L. Chin, Samir Saba Tags: Atrial Fibrillation, Quality and Outcomes, Intracranial Hemorrhage, Ischemic Stroke Original Contributions Source Type: research