Filtered By:
Specialty: Health Management
Drug: Pradaxa

This page shows you your search results in order of relevance.

Order by Relevance | Date

Total 19 results found since Jan 2013.

Updating the Cost Effectiveness of Oral Anticoagulants for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Based on Varying Stroke and Bleed Risk Profiles
ConclusionsFrom a US private payer ’s perspective, dabigatran appears cost effective compared with other anticoagulants. This study indicated risk stratification especially considering both stroke and bleed risk simultaneously is important not only in clinical practice but also in health technology assessment exercises among patien ts with atrial fibrillation.
Source: PharmacoEconomics - September 13, 2020 Category: Health Management Source Type: research

Comparison of All-Cause, Stroke, and Bleed-Specific Healthcare Resource Utilization among Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) and Newly Treated with Dabigatran or Warfarin.
CONCLUSION: Among newly diagnosed newly treated NVAF patients, dabigatran users had significantly lower all-cause, stroke- and bleed-specific HCRU, lower risk of hospitalization for stroke or bleed events, lower 30-day readmissions, and higher persistence than warfarin users. PMID: 28649894 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Source: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research - June 28, 2017 Category: Health Management Tags: Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res Source Type: research

A Health Economic Evaluation of Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: Guideline Adherence Versus the Observed Treatment Strategy Prior to 2012 in Denmark
Conclusions Guideline adherence is a cost-effective treatment strategy compared with the strategy employed prior to 2012 for pharmacological stroke prophylaxis in AF.
Source: PharmacoEconomics - May 6, 2015 Category: Health Management Source Type: research

Comparison of Stroke- and Bleed-related Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs among Patients with Newly Diagnosed Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation and Newly Treated with Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, or Warfarin.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that dabigatran patients had lower bleed-related HCRU and lower bleed-related PPPM costs than rivaroxaban patients, and lower outpatient stroke-related HCRU, higher bleed-related outpatient HCRU, and lower bleed-related PPPM costs than warfarin patients. It provides valuable stroke-related and bleed-related HCRU and costs information among commercially-insured and Medicare patients. PMID: 30251553 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Source: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research - September 27, 2018 Category: Health Management Tags: Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res Source Type: research

Real-world comparison of all-cause hospitalizations, hospitalizations due to stroke and major bleeding, and costs for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients prescribed oral anticoagulants in a US health plan.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated a significantly higher risk of hospitalization (all-cause, stroke/SE, and major bleeding) associated with warfarin, a significantly higher risk of major bleeding hospitalization associated with dabigatran or rivaroxaban, and a significantly higher risk of all-cause hospitalization associated with rivaroxaban compared to apixaban. Lower major bleeding-related costs were observed for apixaban patients compared to warfarin and rivaroxaban patients. PMID: 29047304 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Source: Journal of Medical Economics - October 20, 2017 Category: Health Management Tags: J Med Econ Source Type: research

Cost Effectiveness of Novel Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Depending on the Quality of Warfarin Anticoagulation Control
Conclusion The cost effectiveness of NOACs for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who are at increased risk for stroke is highly sensitive to warfarin anticoagulation control. NOACs are more likely to be cost-effective options in settings with poor warfarin management than in settings with better anticoagulation control, where they may not represent good value for money.
Source: PharmacoEconomics - December 16, 2014 Category: Health Management Source Type: research

Number needed to treat based on real-world evidence for non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
CONCLUSIONS: The NNT calculation, when approached and interpreted properly, is a practical measure of the effectiveness of a treatment. The calculation based on HRs showed that NOACs are safe and effective alternatives to VKAs in real life. PMID: 30969801 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Source: Journal of Medical Economics - April 12, 2019 Category: Health Management Tags: J Med Econ Source Type: research

A Decision Analysis of Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Relative to Novel and Traditional Oral Anticoagulation for Stroke Prevention in Patients with New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation
Conclusions. Apixaban is the most cost-effective therapy for stroke prevention in patients with new-onset NVAF without contraindications to OAC. Uncertainty around this conclusion exists, highlighting the need for further research.
Source: Medical Decision Making - February 29, 2016 Category: Health Management Authors: Micieli, A., Wijeysundera, H. C., Qiu, F., Atzema, C. L., Singh, S. M. Tags: Original Articles Source Type: research

Cost-effectiveness analysis of apixaban compared to other direct oral anticoagulants for prevention of stroke in Austrian atrial fibrillation patients.
CONCLUSION: In patients with AF and an increased risk of stroke, prophylaxis with apixaban was highly cost-effective from the perspective of the Austrian health care system. PMID: 32700584 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Source: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research - July 24, 2020 Category: Health Management Tags: Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res Source Type: research

Cost-effectiveness of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic and qualitative review.
Authors: Liberato NL, Marchetti M Abstract The introduction of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) into clinical practice represented a major change in the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF); drugs as effective as the gold standard were available, rapidly functioning and without major interferences with drugs and foods. However, a huge increase in the economic burden of NVAF was predicted, and many cost-effectiveness analyses were developed to aid policy makers and clinicians in implementing strategies for the prevention of stroke in NVAF. The present systematic review identified ...
Source: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research - February 13, 2016 Category: Health Management Tags: Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res Source Type: research

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Thai Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation and a High Risk of Bleeding
ConclusionsFor both societal and payer perspectives, high-dose edoxaban with a price below the country cost-effectiveness threshold should be the first anticoagulant option for Thai patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and a high risk of bleeding.
Source: PharmacoEconomics - November 2, 2018 Category: Health Management Source Type: research

Preferences for Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation: a Best–Best Discrete Choice Experiment
Conclusions Based on the study sample and the modelled attributes, the overall profiles of the new oral anticoagulants were preferred to warfarin as their cost decreased. Public subsidisation and the development of antidotes (such as vitamin K for warfarin) for the new oral anticoagulants may have a positive effect on the under-treatment of AF.
Source: PharmacoEconomics - October 26, 2014 Category: Health Management Source Type: research

Does X(a) mark the spot? An indirect mixed treatment comparison of Xa inhibitors compared to warfarin for patients with Atrial Fibrillation
ConclusionsThe Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants constitute a new and promising category in the field of atrial fibrillation, even in the context of uncertainty, which an indirect comparison yields.
Source: Health Policy and Technology - August 10, 2019 Category: Health Management Source Type: research

Apixaban versus other anticoagulants in patients with nonvalvular fibrillation: a comparison of all-cause and event-related costs in real-life setting in France
ConclusionsHCRU and most event-related costs were lower in patients initiating apixaban compared to other OACs. Apixaban may be cost-saving compared to VKAs, and significantly cheaper than other DOACs, although cost differences are limited.
Source: The European Journal of Health Economics - August 28, 2022 Category: Health Management Source Type: research