An Improved Peer-Review System to Compensate for Scientific Misconduct in Health-Sensitive Topics
Public Health Rev. 2023 Jun 2;44:1605601. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2023.1605601. eCollection 2023.NO ABSTRACTPMID:37332396 | PMC:PMC10272364 | DOI:10.3389/phrs.2023.1605601 (Source: Public Health Reviews)
Source: Public Health Reviews - June 19, 2023 Category: International Medicine & Public Health Authors: Alessandro Rovetta Rossana Garavaglia Alessandro Vitale Ettore Meccia Behailu Terefe Tesfaye Paolo Mezzana Vincenzo Accurso Source Type: research
A 7-Step Guideline for Qualitative Synthesis and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Health Sciences
Conclusion: We provided 7 steps to synthesize evidence from observational studies. We encourage medical and public health practitioners who answer important questions to systematically integrate evidence from observational studies and contribute evidence-based decision-making in health sciences.PMID:37260612 | PMC:PMC10227668 | DOI:10.3389/phrs.2023.1605454 (Source: Public Health Reviews)
Source: Public Health Reviews - June 1, 2023 Category: International Medicine & Public Health Authors: Marija Glisic Peter Francis Raguindin Armin Gemperli Petek Eylul Taneri Dante Jr Salvador Trudy Voortman Pedro Marques Vidal Stefania I Papatheodorou Setor K Kunutsor Arjola Bano John P A Ioannidis Taulant Muka Source Type: research
