Unrestrained Versus Vertically Restrained Loaded Countermovement Jumps: Are There Any Differences in the Components of Force Application?
The objective of this study was to compare a number of variables derived from the vertical and horizontal force components between loaded countermovement jumps performed in a Smith machine (SM modality; vertically restrained jumps) and with free weights (FW modality; unrestrained jumps). Twenty-three recreationally trained individuals, 6 women and 17 men, performed on a 3D force platform 5 maximal countermovement jump trials against 3 external loads (30%, 50%, and 70% of the SM 1-repetition maximum) using the SM and FW jumping modalities on separate sessions. The SM modality promoted greater values for virtually all the va...
Source: Journal of Applied Biomechanics - January 18, 2024 Category: Sports Medicine Authors: Marcos Guti érrez-Dávila Daniel Marcos-Frutos Carmen Guti érrez-Cruz Amador Garc ía-Ramos Source Type: research
Comparison of Concurrent and Asynchronous Running Kinematics and Kinetics From Marker-Based and Markerless Motion Capture Under Varying Clothing Conditions
J Appl Biomech. 2024 Jan 18:1-9. doi: 10.1123/jab.2023-0069. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTAs markerless motion capture is increasingly used to measure 3-dimensional human pose, it is important to understand how markerless results can be interpreted alongside historical marker-based data and how they are impacted by clothing. We compared concurrent running kinematics and kinetics between marker-based and markerless motion capture, and between 2 markerless clothing conditions. Thirty adults ran on an instrumented treadmill wearing motion capture clothing while concurrent marker-based and markerless data were recorded, and r...
Source: Journal of Applied Biomechanics - January 18, 2024 Category: Sports Medicine Authors: Robert M Kanko Jereme B Outerleys Elise K Laende W Scott Selbie Kevin J Deluzio Source Type: research
Unrestrained Versus Vertically Restrained Loaded Countermovement Jumps: Are There Any Differences in the Components of Force Application?
The objective of this study was to compare a number of variables derived from the vertical and horizontal force components between loaded countermovement jumps performed in a Smith machine (SM modality; vertically restrained jumps) and with free weights (FW modality; unrestrained jumps). Twenty-three recreationally trained individuals, 6 women and 17 men, performed on a 3D force platform 5 maximal countermovement jump trials against 3 external loads (30%, 50%, and 70% of the SM 1-repetition maximum) using the SM and FW jumping modalities on separate sessions. The SM modality promoted greater values for virtually all the va...
Source: Journal of Applied Biomechanics - January 18, 2024 Category: Sports Medicine Authors: Marcos Guti érrez-Dávila Daniel Marcos-Frutos Carmen Guti érrez-Cruz Amador Garc ía-Ramos Source Type: research
Comparison of Concurrent and Asynchronous Running Kinematics and Kinetics From Marker-Based and Markerless Motion Capture Under Varying Clothing Conditions
J Appl Biomech. 2024 Jan 18:1-9. doi: 10.1123/jab.2023-0069. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTAs markerless motion capture is increasingly used to measure 3-dimensional human pose, it is important to understand how markerless results can be interpreted alongside historical marker-based data and how they are impacted by clothing. We compared concurrent running kinematics and kinetics between marker-based and markerless motion capture, and between 2 markerless clothing conditions. Thirty adults ran on an instrumented treadmill wearing motion capture clothing while concurrent marker-based and markerless data were recorded, and r...
Source: Journal of Applied Biomechanics - January 18, 2024 Category: Sports Medicine Authors: Robert M Kanko Jereme B Outerleys Elise K Laende W Scott Selbie Kevin J Deluzio Source Type: research
Unrestrained Versus Vertically Restrained Loaded Countermovement Jumps: Are There Any Differences in the Components of Force Application?
The objective of this study was to compare a number of variables derived from the vertical and horizontal force components between loaded countermovement jumps performed in a Smith machine (SM modality; vertically restrained jumps) and with free weights (FW modality; unrestrained jumps). Twenty-three recreationally trained individuals, 6 women and 17 men, performed on a 3D force platform 5 maximal countermovement jump trials against 3 external loads (30%, 50%, and 70% of the SM 1-repetition maximum) using the SM and FW jumping modalities on separate sessions. The SM modality promoted greater values for virtually all the va...
Source: Journal of Applied Biomechanics - January 18, 2024 Category: Sports Medicine Authors: Marcos Guti érrez-Dávila Daniel Marcos-Frutos Carmen Guti érrez-Cruz Amador Garc ía-Ramos Source Type: research
Comparison of Concurrent and Asynchronous Running Kinematics and Kinetics From Marker-Based and Markerless Motion Capture Under Varying Clothing Conditions
J Appl Biomech. 2024 Jan 18:1-9. doi: 10.1123/jab.2023-0069. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTAs markerless motion capture is increasingly used to measure 3-dimensional human pose, it is important to understand how markerless results can be interpreted alongside historical marker-based data and how they are impacted by clothing. We compared concurrent running kinematics and kinetics between marker-based and markerless motion capture, and between 2 markerless clothing conditions. Thirty adults ran on an instrumented treadmill wearing motion capture clothing while concurrent marker-based and markerless data were recorded, and r...
Source: Journal of Applied Biomechanics - January 18, 2024 Category: Sports Medicine Authors: Robert M Kanko Jereme B Outerleys Elise K Laende W Scott Selbie Kevin J Deluzio Source Type: research
Unrestrained Versus Vertically Restrained Loaded Countermovement Jumps: Are There Any Differences in the Components of Force Application?
The objective of this study was to compare a number of variables derived from the vertical and horizontal force components between loaded countermovement jumps performed in a Smith machine (SM modality; vertically restrained jumps) and with free weights (FW modality; unrestrained jumps). Twenty-three recreationally trained individuals, 6 women and 17 men, performed on a 3D force platform 5 maximal countermovement jump trials against 3 external loads (30%, 50%, and 70% of the SM 1-repetition maximum) using the SM and FW jumping modalities on separate sessions. The SM modality promoted greater values for virtually all the va...
Source: Journal of Applied Biomechanics - January 18, 2024 Category: Sports Medicine Authors: Marcos Guti érrez-Dávila Daniel Marcos-Frutos Carmen Guti érrez-Cruz Amador Garc ía-Ramos Source Type: research
Comparison of Concurrent and Asynchronous Running Kinematics and Kinetics From Marker-Based and Markerless Motion Capture Under Varying Clothing Conditions
J Appl Biomech. 2024 Jan 18:1-9. doi: 10.1123/jab.2023-0069. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTAs markerless motion capture is increasingly used to measure 3-dimensional human pose, it is important to understand how markerless results can be interpreted alongside historical marker-based data and how they are impacted by clothing. We compared concurrent running kinematics and kinetics between marker-based and markerless motion capture, and between 2 markerless clothing conditions. Thirty adults ran on an instrumented treadmill wearing motion capture clothing while concurrent marker-based and markerless data were recorded, and r...
Source: Journal of Applied Biomechanics - January 18, 2024 Category: Sports Medicine Authors: Robert M Kanko Jereme B Outerleys Elise K Laende W Scott Selbie Kevin J Deluzio Source Type: research
Unrestrained Versus Vertically Restrained Loaded Countermovement Jumps: Are There Any Differences in the Components of Force Application?
The objective of this study was to compare a number of variables derived from the vertical and horizontal force components between loaded countermovement jumps performed in a Smith machine (SM modality; vertically restrained jumps) and with free weights (FW modality; unrestrained jumps). Twenty-three recreationally trained individuals, 6 women and 17 men, performed on a 3D force platform 5 maximal countermovement jump trials against 3 external loads (30%, 50%, and 70% of the SM 1-repetition maximum) using the SM and FW jumping modalities on separate sessions. The SM modality promoted greater values for virtually all the va...
Source: Journal of Applied Biomechanics - January 18, 2024 Category: Sports Medicine Authors: Marcos Guti érrez-Dávila Daniel Marcos-Frutos Carmen Guti érrez-Cruz Amador Garc ía-Ramos Source Type: research
Comparison of Concurrent and Asynchronous Running Kinematics and Kinetics From Marker-Based and Markerless Motion Capture Under Varying Clothing Conditions
J Appl Biomech. 2024 Jan 18:1-9. doi: 10.1123/jab.2023-0069. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTAs markerless motion capture is increasingly used to measure 3-dimensional human pose, it is important to understand how markerless results can be interpreted alongside historical marker-based data and how they are impacted by clothing. We compared concurrent running kinematics and kinetics between marker-based and markerless motion capture, and between 2 markerless clothing conditions. Thirty adults ran on an instrumented treadmill wearing motion capture clothing while concurrent marker-based and markerless data were recorded, and r...
Source: Journal of Applied Biomechanics - January 18, 2024 Category: Sports Medicine Authors: Robert M Kanko Jereme B Outerleys Elise K Laende W Scott Selbie Kevin J Deluzio Source Type: research
Unrestrained Versus Vertically Restrained Loaded Countermovement Jumps: Are There Any Differences in the Components of Force Application?
The objective of this study was to compare a number of variables derived from the vertical and horizontal force components between loaded countermovement jumps performed in a Smith machine (SM modality; vertically restrained jumps) and with free weights (FW modality; unrestrained jumps). Twenty-three recreationally trained individuals, 6 women and 17 men, performed on a 3D force platform 5 maximal countermovement jump trials against 3 external loads (30%, 50%, and 70% of the SM 1-repetition maximum) using the SM and FW jumping modalities on separate sessions. The SM modality promoted greater values for virtually all the va...
Source: Journal of Applied Biomechanics - January 18, 2024 Category: Sports Medicine Authors: Marcos Guti érrez-Dávila Daniel Marcos-Frutos Carmen Guti érrez-Cruz Amador Garc ía-Ramos Source Type: research
Comparison of Concurrent and Asynchronous Running Kinematics and Kinetics From Marker-Based and Markerless Motion Capture Under Varying Clothing Conditions
J Appl Biomech. 2024 Jan 18:1-9. doi: 10.1123/jab.2023-0069. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTAs markerless motion capture is increasingly used to measure 3-dimensional human pose, it is important to understand how markerless results can be interpreted alongside historical marker-based data and how they are impacted by clothing. We compared concurrent running kinematics and kinetics between marker-based and markerless motion capture, and between 2 markerless clothing conditions. Thirty adults ran on an instrumented treadmill wearing motion capture clothing while concurrent marker-based and markerless data were recorded, and r...
Source: Journal of Applied Biomechanics - January 18, 2024 Category: Sports Medicine Authors: Robert M Kanko Jereme B Outerleys Elise K Laende W Scott Selbie Kevin J Deluzio Source Type: research
Unrestrained Versus Vertically Restrained Loaded Countermovement Jumps: Are There Any Differences in the Components of Force Application?
The objective of this study was to compare a number of variables derived from the vertical and horizontal force components between loaded countermovement jumps performed in a Smith machine (SM modality; vertically restrained jumps) and with free weights (FW modality; unrestrained jumps). Twenty-three recreationally trained individuals, 6 women and 17 men, performed on a 3D force platform 5 maximal countermovement jump trials against 3 external loads (30%, 50%, and 70% of the SM 1-repetition maximum) using the SM and FW jumping modalities on separate sessions. The SM modality promoted greater values for virtually all the va...
Source: Journal of Applied Biomechanics - January 18, 2024 Category: Sports Medicine Authors: Marcos Guti érrez-Dávila Daniel Marcos-Frutos Carmen Guti érrez-Cruz Amador Garc ía-Ramos Source Type: research
Comparison of Concurrent and Asynchronous Running Kinematics and Kinetics From Marker-Based and Markerless Motion Capture Under Varying Clothing Conditions
J Appl Biomech. 2024 Jan 18:1-9. doi: 10.1123/jab.2023-0069. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTAs markerless motion capture is increasingly used to measure 3-dimensional human pose, it is important to understand how markerless results can be interpreted alongside historical marker-based data and how they are impacted by clothing. We compared concurrent running kinematics and kinetics between marker-based and markerless motion capture, and between 2 markerless clothing conditions. Thirty adults ran on an instrumented treadmill wearing motion capture clothing while concurrent marker-based and markerless data were recorded, and r...
Source: Journal of Applied Biomechanics - January 18, 2024 Category: Sports Medicine Authors: Robert M Kanko Jereme B Outerleys Elise K Laende W Scott Selbie Kevin J Deluzio Source Type: research
Unrestrained Versus Vertically Restrained Loaded Countermovement Jumps: Are There Any Differences in the Components of Force Application?
The objective of this study was to compare a number of variables derived from the vertical and horizontal force components between loaded countermovement jumps performed in a Smith machine (SM modality; vertically restrained jumps) and with free weights (FW modality; unrestrained jumps). Twenty-three recreationally trained individuals, 6 women and 17 men, performed on a 3D force platform 5 maximal countermovement jump trials against 3 external loads (30%, 50%, and 70% of the SM 1-repetition maximum) using the SM and FW jumping modalities on separate sessions. The SM modality promoted greater values for virtually all the va...
Source: Journal of Applied Biomechanics - January 18, 2024 Category: Sports Medicine Authors: Marcos Guti érrez-Dávila Daniel Marcos-Frutos Carmen Guti érrez-Cruz Amador Garc ía-Ramos Source Type: research
