Evolution of retracted publications in the medical sciences: Citations analysis, bibliometrics, and altmetrics trends
Account Res. 2023 Jun 16:1-16. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2223996. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTWe investigated reasons for retraction, pre-and post-retraction citations and Altmetrics indicators of retracted publications in the medical sciences from 2016 to 2020. Data were retrieved from Scopus (n = 840). The Retraction Watch database was used to identify the reasons for retraction and the time that elapsed from publication to retraction. The findings showed that intentional errors were the most prevalent reasons for retraction. China (438), the United States (130), and India (51) have the largest share of retractions. T...
Source: Accountability in Research - June 13, 2023 Category: Medical Ethics Authors: Shahnaz Khademizadeh Farshid Danesh Samira Esmaeili Brady Lund Karen Santos-d'Amorim Source Type: research
Evolution of retracted publications in the medical sciences: Citations analysis, bibliometrics, and altmetrics trends
Account Res. 2023 Jun 16:1-16. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2223996. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTWe investigated reasons for retraction, pre-and post-retraction citations and Altmetrics indicators of retracted publications in the medical sciences from 2016 to 2020. Data were retrieved from Scopus (n = 840). The Retraction Watch database was used to identify the reasons for retraction and the time that elapsed from publication to retraction. The findings showed that intentional errors were the most prevalent reasons for retraction. China (438), the United States (130), and India (51) have the largest share of retractions. T...
Source: Accountability in Research - June 13, 2023 Category: Medical Ethics Authors: Shahnaz Khademizadeh Farshid Danesh Samira Esmaeili Brady Lund Karen Santos-d'Amorim Source Type: research
Evolution of retracted publications in the medical sciences: Citations analysis, bibliometrics, and altmetrics trends
Account Res. 2023 Jun 16:1-16. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2223996. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTWe investigated reasons for retraction, pre-and post-retraction citations and Altmetrics indicators of retracted publications in the medical sciences from 2016 to 2020. Data were retrieved from Scopus (n = 840). The Retraction Watch database was used to identify the reasons for retraction and the time that elapsed from publication to retraction. The findings showed that intentional errors were the most prevalent reasons for retraction. China (438), the United States (130), and India (51) have the largest share of retractions. T...
Source: Accountability in Research - June 13, 2023 Category: Medical Ethics Authors: Shahnaz Khademizadeh Farshid Danesh Samira Esmaeili Brady Lund Karen Santos-d'Amorim Source Type: research
Evolution of retracted publications in the medical sciences: Citations analysis, bibliometrics, and altmetrics trends
Account Res. 2023 Jun 16:1-16. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2223996. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTWe investigated reasons for retraction, pre-and post-retraction citations and Altmetrics indicators of retracted publications in the medical sciences from 2016 to 2020. Data were retrieved from Scopus (n = 840). The Retraction Watch database was used to identify the reasons for retraction and the time that elapsed from publication to retraction. The findings showed that intentional errors were the most prevalent reasons for retraction. China (438), the United States (130), and India (51) have the largest share of retractions. T...
Source: Accountability in Research - June 13, 2023 Category: Medical Ethics Authors: Shahnaz Khademizadeh Farshid Danesh Samira Esmaeili Brady Lund Karen Santos-d'Amorim Source Type: research
Evolution of retracted publications in the medical sciences: Citations analysis, bibliometrics, and altmetrics trends
Account Res. 2023 Jun 13. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2223996. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTWe investigated reasons for retraction, pre-and post-retraction citations and Altmetrics indicators of retracted publications in the medical sciences from 2016 to 2020. Data were retrieved from Scopus (n = 840). The Retraction Watch database was used to identify the reasons for retraction and the time that elapsed from publication to retraction. The findings showed that intentional errors were the most prevalent reasons for retraction. China (438), the United States (130), and India (51) have the largest share of retractions. These ...
Source: Accountability in Research - June 13, 2023 Category: Medical Ethics Authors: Shahnaz Khademizadeh Farshid Danesh Samira Esmaeili Brady Lund Karen Santos-d'Amorim Source Type: research
