Low sensitivity of the new FIGO classification system for electronic fetal monitoring to identify fetal acidosis in the second stage of labor?

I read with interest the paper entitled “Low sensitivity of the new FIGO classification system for electronic fetal monitoring to identify fetal acidosis in the second stage of labor” [1]. With the due respect, the title of the paper should be changed, according to the four points presented below. A title like “The FIGO-15 and the S WE-17 CTG classifications may have similar performances in detection of fetal acidosis in the second stage of labor”, would be more appropriate, considering the (clinical) impact that a title may always have.

Source: European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology - February 3, 2021 Category: OBGYN Authors: Jo ão Bernardes Tags: Correspondence Source Type: research