The future of decision-making in critical care after Cuthbertson v. Rasouli

Conclusion The SCC ruled that due to the legal definition of “health-related purpose”, which is distinct from medical benefit, consent is required to withdraw life-support and outlined the steps to be taken should conflict arise. The SCC decision did not directly address the role of medical standard of care in these situations. In order to ensure optimal decision-making and communication with patients and their families, it is critical for healthcare providers to have a clear understanding of the implications of this legal ruling on medical practice.
Source: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia - Category: Anesthesiology Source Type: research