Agents, Virgins, S.s, and Losers: The Sexual Typecasting of Young Heterosexual Women

AbstractIn a 2015 contribution toSex Roles’s Feminist Forum, Bay-Cheng argued that contemporary social evaluations of young women hinge not only on their apparent adherence to gendered moralist norms of sexual activity, but also on their performance of a neoliberal script of sexual agency. We used a mixed method approach to test this prop osal, specifically its alignment with the evaluative dimensions of the Stereotype Content Model (SCM; Fiske2013). We asked 186  U.S. adults (aged 19–64) to imagine four “sexual types” of young heterosexual women: sexually active and agenticAgents; sexually abstinent and agenticVirgins; sexually active but not agenticS.s; andLosers, who are sexually abstinent and not agentic. Qualitative analysis of open-ended responses and quantitative analysis of personality attribute ratings indicated that participants evaluated the types differently and in ways that often mapped onto the SCM. We also conducted post-hoc inductive thematic analysis of the qualitative data, finding meaningful differences among participants ’ impressions of the types in relation to their sociability, femininity, and vulnerability. Alongside signs of progress toward the affirmation of young women’s sexual agency, we also found that social evaluations of young women continue to hinge on their sexuality and traditionally gendered norm s.

Source: Sex Roles - March 21, 2018 Category: International Medicine & Public Health Source Type: research