Medicalization, Contributory Injustice, and Mad Studies

Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2022;32(4):401-434. doi: 10.1353/ken.2022.0023.ABSTRACTOne recent body of work has concerned medicalization and how it can create epistemic injustice. It focuses on medicalization as a hermeneutical process that shapes the conceptual framework(s) we use to refer to some conditions/experiences. In parallel, some scholars with lived experience of madness have started to explore the epistemic harms suffered by the Mad community. Building on this, I argue that the process of medicalization in psychiatry affects the Mad community in a specific way that has been overlooked in the literature on medicalization and epistemic injustice. That is, medicalization can create what is called "contributory injustice." This form of injustice occurs when marginalized communities have been able to create alternative hermeneutical resources, but these resources are dismissed or discredited by the dominant group. I argue that the emerging field of Mad Studies is a victim of this type of injustice when Mad experiences are unilaterally medicalized.PMID:38588217 | DOI:10.1353/ken.2022.0023
Source: Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal - Category: Medical Ethics Authors: Source Type: research