Comparing the performance of two-stage residual inclusion methods when using physician's prescribing preference as an instrumental variable: unmeasured confounding and noncollapsibility

Conclusion: 2SRI tends to be less biased than GLM and 2SPS in terms of estimating treatment effect. It can be robust to noncollapsibility in the case of the mild unmeasured confounding effect.PMID:38567965 | DOI:10.57264/cer-2023-0085
Source: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research - Category: General Medicine Authors: Source Type: research
More News: General Medicine | Study