Thickness and design features of clinical cranial implants —what should automated methods strive to replicate?

ConclusionsFor implant modelers or manufacturers, this shape analysis quantified differences of cranial implants (thickness, rim width, surface area, and volume) to help guide future automated design algorithms. After skull completion, a thicker implant can be more versatile for cases involving muscle hollowing or thin skulls, and wider rims can smooth over the defect margins to provide more stability. For clinicians, the differing measurements and implant designs can help inform the options available for their patient specific treatment.
Source: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery - Category: Intensive Care Source Type: research