Ultracongruent Designs Compared to Posterior-Stabilized and Cruciate-Retaining Tibial Inserts —What Does the Evidence Tell Us? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.—Letter to Editor

We enjoyed reading the recently published work by Wenzel et  al on the comparison of ultracongruent (UC) with posterior-stabilized (PS) and cruciate-retaining (CR) polyethylene inserts in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) [1]. The main highlight of this study was that it was perhaps the first meta-analysis to compare the kinematics of UC and CR inserts, and for this we congratulate the authors.

Source: The Journal of Arthroplasty - February 9, 2024 Category: Orthopaedics Authors: Karthik Vishwanathan, Raju Vaishya Tags: Letter to the Editor Source Type: research