A Glimpse at the Future of Preventative Treatment for Aging

At some point, the various measures of biological age currently under development and assessment will coalesce into some form of consensus measurement, largely agreed upon, the objections to its use minimal and circumstantial. At that point, a great deal of effort will go into assessing established and new interventions that might decrease or slow the progression of that consensus measure of biological age. It will likely take some decades for the back and forth of real time validation of interventions to treat aging to progress thereafter, but things will certainly become a great deal more heated once the research community agrees on how to best measure biological age. Meanwhile, it is certainly possible today for anyone to propose a measure and demonstrate that some interventions affect it, but unlikely that any great number of other people will agree that this is the right, useful, or in any way proven measure of aging.

Clinical healthy aging recommendations are disease-centric and reactive rather than focusing on holistic, organismal aging. In contrast, biological age (BA) estimation informs risk stratification by predicting all-cause mortality, however current BA clocks are not connected to underlying aging mechanisms, making it difficult to intervene clinically.

To generate actionable BA clocks, we developed and validated a principal component (PC)-based clinical aging clock (PCAge) that identifies signatures (PCs) associated with healthy and unhealthy a...

Source: Fight Aging! - August 4, 2023 Category: Research Authors: Reason Tags: Daily News Source Type: blogs