No, AI won ’t kill creativity

Recently, I had a conversation with a well-known illustrator friend who was expressing his discontent about artificial intelligence. As our conversation escalated online, several creative professionals joined in, lamenting the supposed death of art, creativity, and, consequently, our livelihoods. creativity, nounthe ability to produce or use original and unusual ideas I added my two cents that AI should not be perceived as competition, but rather as a tool to align with our times. I argued that ChatGPT wouldn’t transform anyone into a journalist, just as Midjourney wouldn’t make me a graphic designer, because I miss the skills to use it right. And then a graphic designer girl got very emotional. “Midjourney? You are not a designer yourself, so you fail to see that what it does is a piece of shit”. While I understand – and partially share some of – these worries, I don’t think AI is ready to kill art and/or creativity or take our jobs.  Here’s why. This could be a really short article, I should link this thread with ChatGPT. It unequivocally demonstrates how AI can’t perform a task if you don’t know how to do it yourself. For those who’d rather not click: I asked ChatGPT to write this article, and the result was:  Dull Superficial Wordy Even more dull Despite using various trending prompt engineering techniques, the outcome remained the same. If I had devoted a few more hours to this proj...
Source: The Medical Futurist - Category: Information Technology Authors: Tags: TMF Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Source Type: blogs