Effect on diagnostic accuracy of cognitive reasoning tools for the workplace setting: systematic review and meta-analysis
Conclusion
Cognitive reasoning tools resulted in small but clinically important improvements in diagnostic accuracy in medical students and professionals, although no factors could be distinguished that resulted in larger improvements. Cognitive reasoning tools could be routinely implemented to improve diagnosis in practice, but going forward, more large-scale studies and evaluations of these tools in practice are needed to determine how these tools can be effectively implemented.
PROSPERO registration number
CRD42020186994.
Source: BMJ Quality and Safety - Category: General Medicine Authors: Staal, J., Hooftman, J., Gunput, S. T. G., Mamede, S., Frens, M. A., Van den Broek, W. W., Alsma, J., Zwaan, L. Tags: Open access Systematic review Source Type: research
More News: Education | General Medicine | Science | Students | Study | Training | Universities & Medical Training