Filtered By:
Source: The American Journal of Cardiology
Condition: Bleeding
Countries: USA Health

This page shows you your search results in order of relevance.

Order by Relevance | Date

Total 3 results found since Jan 2013.

Trends in the Utilization of Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion in the United States
Stroke prevention remains a cornerstone in the management of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF)1. Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is the main method of stroke prevention in NVAF worldwide. However,>50% of high-risk NVAF patients are not maintained on OAC due to comorbidities, frailty, bleeding complications, or non-compliance2. In 1996, Blackshear proposed Left atrial appendage exclusion (LAAE) as an alternative stroke prevention strategy in NVAF3. Because no randomized data were available to support the routine use of LAAE, its utilization remained initially limited to selected patients undergoing a concomitant cardiac surgery.
Source: The American Journal of Cardiology - April 6, 2020 Category: Cardiology Authors: Safi U. Khan, Muhammad Zia Khan, Mohamad Alkhouli Source Type: research

Reader's Comments: Trends in the Utilization of Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion in the United States
Stroke prevention remains a cornerstone in the management of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).1 Oral anticoagulation is the main method of stroke prevention in NVAF worldwide. However,>50% of high-risk NVAF patients are not maintained on oral anticoagulation due to comorbidities, frailty, bleeding complications, or noncompliance.2 In 1996, Blackshear proposed left atrial appendage exclusion (LAAE) as an alternative stroke prevention strategy in NVAF.3 Because no randomized data were available to support the routine use of LAAE, its utilization remained initially limited to selected patients undergoing a...
Source: The American Journal of Cardiology - April 6, 2020 Category: Cardiology Authors: Safi U. Khan, Muhammad Zia Khan, Mohamad Alkhouli Source Type: research

Influence of the Danish Co-morbidity Index Score on the Treatment and Outcomes of 2.5 Million Patients Admitted With Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States
This study aimed to determine the association between the Danish Co-morbidity Index for Acute Myocardial Infarction (DANCAMI) and restricted DANCAMI (rDANCAMI) scores and clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with AMI. Using the National Inpatient Sample, all AMI hospitalizations were stratified into four groups based on their DANCAMI and rDANCAMI score (0; 1 to 3; 4 to 5; ≥6). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, whereas secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events, major bleeding, ischemic stroke, and receipt of coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention.
Source: The American Journal of Cardiology - July 14, 2022 Category: Cardiology Authors: Balamrit Singh Sokhal, Andrija Mateti ć, Abhishek, Philip Freeman, Jan Walter Dhillon Shanmuganathan, Mohamed O. Mohamed, Christian Mallen, Mamas A. Mamas Source Type: research