Key issues in the process of implementing shared decision making (DM) in mental health practice
Mental Health Review Journal,Volume 22, Issue 3, Page 257-274, September 2017. Purpose This review paper will look at internationally existing publications in the English language on mental health shared decision making (SDM) implementation of a variety of interventions, including different methodologies and research methods, age groups and countries. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of: process, degree and outcomes of implementation; barriers and facilitators; perspectives on implementation by different stakeholders; analysis of the process of implementation in mental health services through the lenses...
Source: Mental Health Review Journal - September 5, 2017 Category: Psychiatry Source Type: research
Attitudes towards shared decision making in mental health: a qualitative synthesis
Mental Health Review Journal,Volume 22, Issue 3, Page 233-256, September 2017. Purpose Shared decision making (SDM) prioritises joint deliberation between practitioner and service user, and a respect for service-users ’ experiential knowledge, values and preferences. The purpose of this paper is to review the existing literature pertaining to key stakeholders’ attitudes towards SDM in mental health. It examines whether perceived barriers and facilitators differ by group (e.g. service user, psychiatrist, nurse and social worker) and includes views of what facilitates and hinders the process for service users and practi...
Source: Mental Health Review Journal - September 5, 2017 Category: Psychiatry Source Type: research
Measurement issues of shared decision making in mental health: challenges and opportunities
Mental Health Review Journal,Volume 22, Issue 3, Page 214-232, September 2017. Purpose Shared decision making (SDM) is a model of health care in which patients are involved in the decision-making process about their treatment, considering their preferences and concerns in a deliberative process with the health care provider. Many existing instruments assess the antecedents, process, or the outcomes of SDM. The purpose of this paper is to identify the SDM-related measures applied in a mental health context. Design/methodology/approach The authors performed a systematic review in several electronic databases from 1990 to O...
Source: Mental Health Review Journal - September 5, 2017 Category: Psychiatry Source Type: research
Expanding the concept of shared decision making for mental health: systematic search and scoping review of interventions
Mental Health Review Journal,Volume 22, Issue 3, Page 191-213, September 2017. Purpose Much of the existing literature on shared decision making (SDM) in mental health has focused on the use of decision aids (DAs). However, DAs tend to focus on information exchange and neglect other essential elements to SDM in mental health. The purpose of this paper is to expand the review of SDM interventions in mental health by identifying important components, in addition to information exchange, that may contribute to the SDM process in mental health. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a systematic literature search ...
Source: Mental Health Review Journal - September 5, 2017 Category: Psychiatry Source Type: research
Shared decision making within the context of recovery-oriented care
Mental Health Review Journal,Volume 22, Issue 3, Page 179-190, September 2017. Purpose The purpose of this paper is to consider the role of shared decision making (SDM) as one component of recovery-oriented care. Design/methodology/approach This paper is conceptual and reviews the literature relevant to recovery-oriented care, person-centered recovery planning (PCRP), and SDM. Findings To the degree to which SDM offers tools for sharing useful information about treatment options with service users and family members or other loved ones, it can be considered a valuable addition to the recovery-oriented armamentarium. It ...
Source: Mental Health Review Journal - September 5, 2017 Category: Psychiatry Source Type: research
“Work with me”: service users’ perspectives on shared decision making in mental health
Mental Health Review Journal,Volume 22, Issue 3, Page 166-178, September 2017. Purpose While shared decision making (SDM) in general health has proven effectiveness, it has received far less attention within mental health practice with a disconnection between policy and ideals. The purpose of this paper to review existing developments, contemporary challenges, and evidence regarding SDM in mental health with a particular focus on the perspectives of service users. Design/methodology/approach This is a review of international papers analysed using narrative synthesis of relevant data bases. Findings The review shows sign...
Source: Mental Health Review Journal - September 5, 2017 Category: Psychiatry Source Type: research
The rationale for shared decision making in mental health care: a systematic review of academic discourse
This study is a systematic review of peer-reviewed papers presenting a rationale for SDM in mental health. Relevant databases were searched from inception to July 2016. Data were analysed using a thematic analysis which aimed to identify and describe different discourses on the rationale for SDM in mental health care. Data were extracted into a standardised data extraction form which contained fields representing the developing thematic framework, study information and research methodology. Findings An initial search returned returned 1,616 papers, of which 175 were eligible for inclusion in this review. The authors devel...
Source: Mental Health Review Journal - September 5, 2017 Category: Psychiatry Source Type: research
Shared decision making in mental health: special issue of the Mental Health Review Journal
Mental Health Review Journal,Volume 22, Issue 3, Page 149-151, September 2017. (Source: Mental Health Review Journal)
Source: Mental Health Review Journal - September 5, 2017 Category: Psychiatry Source Type: research
Key issues in the process of implementing shared decision making (DM) in mental health practice
Mental Health Review Journal,Volume 22, Issue 3, Page 257-274, September 2017. Purpose This review paper will look at internationally existing publications in the English language on mental health shared decision making (SDM) implementation of a variety of interventions, including different methodologies and research methods, age groups and countries. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of: process, degree and outcomes of implementation; barriers and facilitators; perspectives on implementation by different stakeholders; analysis of the process of implementation in mental health services through the lenses...
Source: Mental Health Review Journal - September 5, 2017 Category: Psychiatry Source Type: research
Attitudes towards shared decision making in mental health: a qualitative synthesis
Mental Health Review Journal,Volume 22, Issue 3, Page 233-256, September 2017. Purpose Shared decision making (SDM) prioritises joint deliberation between practitioner and service user, and a respect for service-users ’ experiential knowledge, values and preferences. The purpose of this paper is to review the existing literature pertaining to key stakeholders’ attitudes towards SDM in mental health. It examines whether perceived barriers and facilitators differ by group (e.g. service user, psychiatrist, nurse and social worker) and includes views of what facilitates and hinders the process for service users and practi...
Source: Mental Health Review Journal - September 5, 2017 Category: Psychiatry Source Type: research
Measurement issues of shared decision making in mental health: challenges and opportunities
Mental Health Review Journal,Volume 22, Issue 3, Page 214-232, September 2017. Purpose Shared decision making (SDM) is a model of health care in which patients are involved in the decision-making process about their treatment, considering their preferences and concerns in a deliberative process with the health care provider. Many existing instruments assess the antecedents, process, or the outcomes of SDM. The purpose of this paper is to identify the SDM-related measures applied in a mental health context. Design/methodology/approach The authors performed a systematic review in several electronic databases from 1990 to O...
Source: Mental Health Review Journal - September 5, 2017 Category: Psychiatry Source Type: research
Expanding the concept of shared decision making for mental health: systematic search and scoping review of interventions
Mental Health Review Journal,Volume 22, Issue 3, Page 191-213, September 2017. Purpose Much of the existing literature on shared decision making (SDM) in mental health has focused on the use of decision aids (DAs). However, DAs tend to focus on information exchange and neglect other essential elements to SDM in mental health. The purpose of this paper is to expand the review of SDM interventions in mental health by identifying important components, in addition to information exchange, that may contribute to the SDM process in mental health. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a systematic literature search ...
Source: Mental Health Review Journal - September 5, 2017 Category: Psychiatry Source Type: research
Shared decision making within the context of recovery-oriented care
Mental Health Review Journal,Volume 22, Issue 3, Page 179-190, September 2017. Purpose The purpose of this paper is to consider the role of shared decision making (SDM) as one component of recovery-oriented care. Design/methodology/approach This paper is conceptual and reviews the literature relevant to recovery-oriented care, person-centered recovery planning (PCRP), and SDM. Findings To the degree to which SDM offers tools for sharing useful information about treatment options with service users and family members or other loved ones, it can be considered a valuable addition to the recovery-oriented armamentarium. It ...
Source: Mental Health Review Journal - September 5, 2017 Category: Psychiatry Source Type: research
“Work with me”: service users’ perspectives on shared decision making in mental health
Mental Health Review Journal,Volume 22, Issue 3, Page 166-178, September 2017. Purpose While shared decision making (SDM) in general health has proven effectiveness, it has received far less attention within mental health practice with a disconnection between policy and ideals. The purpose of this paper to review existing developments, contemporary challenges, and evidence regarding SDM in mental health with a particular focus on the perspectives of service users. Design/methodology/approach This is a review of international papers analysed using narrative synthesis of relevant data bases. Findings The review shows sign...
Source: Mental Health Review Journal - September 5, 2017 Category: Psychiatry Source Type: research
The rationale for shared decision making in mental health care: a systematic review of academic discourse
This study is a systematic review of peer-reviewed papers presenting a rationale for SDM in mental health. Relevant databases were searched from inception to July 2016. Data were analysed using a thematic analysis which aimed to identify and describe different discourses on the rationale for SDM in mental health care. Data were extracted into a standardised data extraction form which contained fields representing the developing thematic framework, study information and research methodology. Findings An initial search returned returned 1,616 papers, of which 175 were eligible for inclusion in this review. The authors devel...
Source: Mental Health Review Journal - September 5, 2017 Category: Psychiatry Source Type: research
