Face-to-face versus online clinically integrated EBM teaching in an undergraduate medical school: a pilot study

Conclusions It was feasible to deliver both models of clinically integrated EBM teaching. While students in the face-to-face model scored higher in EPs; there was no significant difference between the two models of teaching as measured by performances in the ACE tool or the summative assessments.
Source: Evidence-Based Medicine - Category: Internal Medicine Authors: Tags: Original research Source Type: research