Face-to-face versus online clinically integrated EBM teaching in an undergraduate medical school: a pilot study
Conclusions
It was feasible to deliver both models of clinically integrated EBM teaching. While students in the face-to-face model scored higher in EPs; there was no significant difference between the two models of teaching as measured by performances in the ACE tool or the summative assessments.
Source: Evidence-Based Medicine - Category: Internal Medicine Authors: Kumaravel, B., Stewart, C., Ilic, D. Tags: Original research Source Type: research
More News: Education | Internal Medicine | Students | Study | Teaching | Universities & Medical Training