Comparison of responsiveness of the Barthel Index and modified Barthel Index in patients with stroke

CONCLUSIONS: The MBI has better responsiveness than the BI at both the group and individual levels in the patients with early subacute stroke. The MBI is recommended for clinical and research use as an outcome measure for patients with stroke.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe MBI is recommended for clinical and research applications because of its superior ability to detect subtle changes in ADL performance in patients with subacute stroke.The MBI and the BI have equal responsiveness for patients whose magnitude of improvement of ADL is substantial.PMID:35357990 | DOI:10.1080/09638288.2022.2055166
Source: Disability and Rehabilitation - Category: Rehabilitation Authors: Source Type: research