Ad Hominem

There are manylogical fallacies that have been formally identified and you may profit from following the link and seeing a big long list.A particularly common fallacy is called ad hominem. The linked Wikipedia article defines it as " attacking the arguer instead of the argument. " There are sub-types, for example "Circumstantial ad hominem - stating that the arguers personal situation or perceived benefit from advancing a conclusion means that their conclusion is wrong, " and "Traitorous critic fallacy (ergo decedo, ' thus leave ' ) – a critic ' s perceived affiliation is portrayed as the underlying reason for the criticism and the critic is asked to stay away from the issue altogether. "We have a commenter who thinks it ' s clever to claim that we should ignore the information I linked to yesterday because the writer is often critical of Individual 1. That is an inane form of argument. You must assess the evidence the writer provides. Attacking the writer -- in this case because he has a consistent opinion, no less -- is not refutation. But suppose you want additional analyses to support the claim that Individual 1 has been laundering money for Russian mobsters for many years.You might check out David Leonhardt in the New York Times. Or Sean Illing in Vox. Or maybe you ' ll be interested in what Craig Unger had to say in The New Republic. Or Adam Davidson in the New Yorker. Or Garrett M. Graff in Wired. Or even Michael Gerson, who is officiall...
Source: Stayin' Alive - Category: American Health Source Type: blogs