Violence, research, and non-identity in the psychiatric clinic

AbstractViolence in psychiatric clinics has been a consistent problem since the birth of modern psychiatry. In this paper, I examine current efforts to understand and reduce both violence and coercive responses to violence in psychiatry, arguing that these efforts are destined to fall short. By and large, scholarship on psychiatric violence reduction has focused on identifying discrete factors that are statistically associated with violence, such as patient demographics and clinical qualities, in an effort to quantify risk and predict  violent acts before they happen. Using the work of Horkheimer and Adorno, I characterize the theoretical orientation of such efforts asidentity thinking. I then argue that these approaches lead to epistemic imperceptiveness and a subtle form of conceptual restraint on patients. I suggest a reorientation in psychiatric research, away from identity thinking and toward a more productive and just approach to the problem of violence in psychiatric clinics.

Source: Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics - August 1, 2018 Category: Medical Ethics Source Type: research