Trialing transparency at Genome Biology

The theme of Peer Review Week 2017 was transparency, and to mark the occasion, this September we launched a trial of transparent peer review at Genome Biology. Although transparency may mean different things to different people, we are taking it to mean the process whereby the reviewers’ reports, and the authors’ response to them, are published alongside the final article (in situations where both the authors and reviewers opt in). The reviewers may sign their reports if they wish, but this is not mandatory. This model of peer review introduces a degree of openness to the peer review process and helps to address some of the criticisms that have been leveled at traditional peer review. This model of peer review introduces a degree of openness to the peer review process and helps to address some of the criticisms that have been leveled at traditional peer review. A number of journals have been using transparent, or fully open, peer review for many years, but such review models are yet to become mainstream, and are still regarded with skepticism by some. Last year, Nature Communications published results from their transparent peer review trial, showing that they have had good uptake from authors opting to having reviewers’ comments published alongside their articles. This is also one of the motivations of our trial, as well as to find out how this move would be received by reviewers, and whether they would be more likely to decline or accept invitations to p...
Source: BioMed Central Blog - Category: General Medicine Authors: Tags: Open Access Publishing Genome Biology peer review Transparent peer review Source Type: blogs