Prospective Comparison of Two Robotically Navigated Pedicle Screw Instrumentation Techniques

This study aimed to compare screw accuracy and incidence of skive between two robotically navigated instrumented techniques in posterior spine fusion surgery: manual anti-skive instrumentation with an anti-skive cannula (ASC) and the use of a navigated, high-speed drill (HSD). Over a 3-year period, consecutive patients are undergoing RNA posterior fusion surgery with either ASC (n = 53) or HSD (n = 63). Both groups met a value of approximately 292 screws in our analysis (296 ASC, 294 HSD), which was determined by a biostatistician at an academic institution. Screw accuracy and skive was analyzed using preoperative CT and intraoperative three-dimensional (3D) fluoroscopy. Among 590 plann ed robotically inserted pedicle screws (296 ASC, 294 HSD), 245 ASC screws (82.8%) and 283 HSD screws (96.3%) were successfully inserted (p <  0.05). Skive events occurred in 4/283 (1.4%) HSD screws and 15/245 (6.2%) ASC screws (p <  0.05). HSD screws showed better accuracy in the axial and sagittal planes, being closer to planned trajectories in all directions except cranial deviation (p <  0.05). Additionally, HSD had a significantly lower time per screw (1.9 ± 1.0 min) compared to ASC (3.2 ± 2.0 min,p <  0.001). No adverse clinical effects were observed. The HSD technique showed significant improvements in time and screw accuracy compared to ASC. Biplanar fluoroscopy and 3D imaging resulted in significantly lower radiation exposure and time com...

Source: Journal of Robotic Surgery - August 22, 2023 Category: Surgery Source Type: research