A comparison of cone beam computed tomography, standard computed tomography and plain radiographs in the evaluation of medial epicondyle humerus fractures

This study compares the radiation exposure and accuracy of displacement measurements of the four-view X-ray examination (XR), computed tomography (CT) and in-clinic cone-beam CT (CBCT). A cadaveric humerus underwent medial epicondyle osteotomy. The fragment was fixed to the humerus at clinically relevant displacements (6 to 18 mm). Dosimeters were placed around the distal humerus and simulating thyroid location. XR, CT and CBCT were performed at each displacement. Four pediatric orthopedists measured the maximum linear displacement on each XR and 3D reconstruction of the CT and CBCT images. Focal (elbow location) and thyroid radiation exposure was compared between modalities. Intra- and interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for displacement measurements were determined. Mean focal radiation exposures for XR, CT and CBCT were 0.008, 2.061 and 0.478 rad, respectively (P = 0.001). Exposures 10 inches from the elbow for XR, CT and CBCT were 0.001, 0.066 and 0.010 rad, respectively (P = 0.006). At 12 inches, there was no significant difference in exposure between XR and CBCT (P = 0.114). Intra- and interobserver reliabilities were excellent for all measures, except lateral x-ray. CBCT and CT had significantly less deviation from the actual displacement compared to XR (P 
Source: Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B - Category: Orthopaedics Tags: Upper Limb Trauma Source Type: research