Filtered By:
Condition: Hemorrhagic Stroke
Education: Study
Management: Family Practices

This page shows you your search results in order of relevance.

Order by Relevance | Date

Total 62 results found since Jan 2013.

Nonadherence to guidelines for prescribing antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation
Conclusions. Nonadherence to guidelines was found in three out of every five patients. A greater cerebrovascular risk and a lower haemorrhagic risk were associated with this behaviour. Qualitative studies are needed to determine the causes.
Source: Family Practice - July 3, 2016 Category: Primary Care Authors: Navarro-Juan, M., Carbonell-Torregrosa, M. A., Palazon-Bru, A., Martinez-Diaz, A. M., Gil-Guillen, V. F. Tags: Health Service Research Source Type: research

Clinical Inquiries: What are the benefits and risks of daily low-dose aspirin for primary prevention of CV events?
Abstract One nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) will be avoided for every 126 to 138 adults who take daily aspirin for 10 years (strength of recommendation [SOR]: A, systematic reviews and meta-analyses of multiple randomized controlled trials [RCTs]). Taking low-dose aspirin for primary prevention shows no clear mortality benefit. A benefit for primary prevention of stroke is less certain. Although no evidence establishes increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke from daily low-dose aspirin, one gastrointestinal hemorrhage will occur for every 72 to 357 adults who take aspirin for longer than 10 years (SOR: A, system...
Source: The Journal of Family Practice - April 1, 2018 Category: Practice Management Authors: Mutter J, Grandy R, Hulkower S, Stigleman S Tags: J Fam Pract Source Type: research

Primary Prevention of CVD with Aspirin: Benefits vs Risks
J Fam Pract. 2021 Jul;70(6S):S41-S46. doi: 10.12788/jfp.0222.ABSTRACTLow-dose aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA]; 75 to 100 mg/d) is widely used in the prevention of cardiovascular (CV) events based on the results of large-scale studies supporting a benefit. However, questions remain regarding the benefit-risk relationship in certain settings since long-term use of ASA is not devoid of risk. Incontrovertible evidence supports the benefits of ASA treatment, which exceed the risks, in patients who have had a previous CV event (myocardial infarction, stroke, unstable angina, or transient ischemic attack). Nonetheless, the qu...
Source: The Journal of Family Practice - August 25, 2021 Category: Practice Management Authors: Steven M Weisman Stephen Brunton Source Type: research