Antifragile: More Than Being Resilient

One interesting concept that I read in Skip the Line is the difference between being resilient and being antifragile. The term “antifragile” comes from a book by Nassim Taleb but I read about it in Skip the Line by James Altucher.

I always thought that being resilient is good, but it turns out that being antifragile is better. What’s the difference between them? Well, being resilient means that when something hurts you, you bounce back to where you were before. It’s a good thing, right? But being antifragile goes one step further. Being antifragile means that when something hurts you, it makes you stronger than before. 

As you can see, it’s a subtle but important difference. It’s good if you are resilient because then you can keep moving forward despite a setback. The setback won’t stop you; you will recover from it. But when you are antifragile, you will do more than that. Instead of just moving forward as before, you will move forward faster than before. It’s as if you absorb the energy of your opponent!

A good example is the story of Colonel Sanders in starting Kentucky Fried Chicken. Here is an excerpt from my blog post:

He once had a successful restaurant. Life seemed good for him. But then something unexpected happened: authorities moved the highway junction in front of his restaurant to another site. As a result, the number of visitors to his restaurant plummeted. He eventually had to sell his restaurant. Worse, he was already 66 years old ...

Source: Life Optimizer - March 4, 2022 Category: Consumer Health News Authors: Donald Latumahina Tags: Attitude Source Type: blogs