vNOTES Hysterectomy Aided By Transcervical Instrumental Uterine Manipulation
ConclusionDuring vNOTES hysterectomy, using an instrument placed transcervically into the uterus for manipulation gives a leverage that helps in good exposure of all uterine attachments. It prevents unintentional rotation of uterus and its attachments. Therefore, surgeon is not required to use second hand for retraction of uterus during surgery. This allows surgeon to use second hand for retraction of bowel and adnexa. As the tip of instruments is not completely visible in vNOTES surgery, manipulation helps to deflect the uterus and its attachments away from important structures thus preventing inadvertent thermal damage from the tip of the instrument. This is a feasible and safe technique of vNOTES hysterectomy.
ConclusionLaparoscopic TARM with PPM in sublay avoids mesh –bowel contact. It provides midline closure and PCS-TAR within the same port geometry with results comparable with ORS.
Anti-fog solution packaged in a Tyvek peel pouch and it is placed into various kits. Kit are labeled as follows: ROBOTIC GENERAL, LAP CHOLE, GENERAL LAPAROSCOPY PACK-LF, T&A PACK, LAP CHOLE PACK-LF, LAPAROSCOPY PACK-LF, EAR ACCESSORY PACK, RF LAP CHOLEPACK (LCLUI)642-LF, GEN LAPAROSCOPY PACK-LF, LAPAROSCOPY PELVISCOPY PACK, LAP ABDOMINAL CDS-LF, GENERAL LAPAROSCOPY CDS, GYN LAPAROSCOPY CDS, CSMC/ENDOSINUS/NASAL PACK-LF, GENERAL LAPAROSCOPY PACK, GENERAL SURGERY, MODULE TONSIL, MODULE GYN LAP NATALIE, GEN SURGERY LAP CHOLE PACK, T &A CDS, GYN LAPAROSCOPY PACK, GENERAL LAPAROSCOPY, GYN LAPAROSCOPY, TONSIL PACK, LAPAROSCO...
ConclusionBecause the tip of instrument is not completely visible in vNOTES surgery, manipulation helps to deflect the uterus and its attachments away from important structures, thus preventing inadvertent thermal damage from the tip of the instrument. This is a feasible and safe technique for vNOTES hysterectomy.
CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing hysteroscopic sterilization have a higher risk of receiving an additional tubal resection or ligation than those undergoing laparoscopic sterilization, particularly within the first year of the index procedure. There is no difference in undergoing a subsequent hysterectomy between the two groups. With limited evidence of outcomes after hysteroscopic sterilization beyond 7 years and existing reports of removals years after initial implantations, continuous monitoring of long-term outcomes for women who received the device is warranted. PMID: 30633141 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
ConclusionTo conclude, preoperative embolization of the arteriovenous shunt improves surgery, avoiding excessive bleeding and permitting easier radical hysterectomy for deep pelvic endometriosis. Similar cases have been published , but to our knowledge, our video is the first regarding this subject. It appears that embolization can fail, but hysterectomy remains the gold standard treatment .
Sandra Maddock, president and CEO, IMARC Research Thanks in large part to innovation in the medical device industry, the average human lifespan has nearly doubled in the past hundred years. Medical devices have undoubtedly improved the quality of life for millions of people, too. But a provocative new Netflix documentary raises an important question: Is there a point when innovation goes too far? The Bleeding Edge, produced by Academy-Award nominated filmmakers Kirby Dick and Amy Ziering, tells the stories of patients who say they’ve suffered serious health problems as a result of recent medical devices being used ...
CONCLUSION: This case series suggests that laparoscopic salpingectomy for removal of Essure inserts is safe and feasible. We acknowledge that the numbers were small. However, consistent use of a laparoscopic approach in these eight patients indicates that this procedure is a feasible and suitable alternative to hysterectomy. PMID: 29842838 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
CONCLUSION: Patients with more than two Essure® devices comprise an unusual group with a complex pelvic foreign body presentation. This is the first report on surgical management for such patients, underscoring the importance of localizing these contraceptive devices with careful imaging before, during, and after surgery. Moreover, hysterectomy is not absolutely mandatory in this setting and intraoperative fluoroscopy/radiography can facilitate complete, safe removal of all implants on an out-patient basis. Creation of ICD-10 modifiers for various post-HS complaints would allow for improved surveillance of the Essure&r...
Conclusion This is a simple and reproducible technique for preventing major complications associated with LESS salpingectomy. This approach permits easier specimen retrieval because of the large solitary incision that is made. There is a significant improvement in cosmetic satisfaction when compared with a traditional laparoscopic approach in the setting of prophylactic risk reduction surgery .
The objectives were to compare the long-term outcomes, including hysterectomy, chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), in women post hysteroscopic sterilization (HS) and laparoscopic tubal ligation (TL) in the Medicaid population.