• Filter By:
• Specialty
• Source
• Condition
• Cancer
• Infectious Disease
• Drug
• Training
• Management
• Procedure
• Therapy
• Vaccine
• Nutrition
• Country

Budget impact analysis of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in low, intermediate, and high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis in Saudi Arabia
CONCLUSIONS: Payers, providers, and policymakers increasingly turn to results of BIA to inform technologies affordability decisions. TAVR with SAPIEN 3 appears to generate savings vs. SAVR from a budget impact perspective across various surgical risk levels in Saudi Arabia.PMID:34927509 | DOI:10.1080/13696998.2021.2020569
Source: Journal of Medical Economics - December 20, 2021 Category: Health Management Authors: Jo ão L Carapinha Hussain A Al-Omar Faisal Alqoofi Sondos A Samargandy Pascal Candolfi Source Type: research

The cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: exploring the Italian National Health System perspective and different patient risk groups
ConclusionsTAVI would be considered cost-effective at frequently cited willingness-to-pay thresholds; further studies could clarify the CE of TAVI in real-life scenarios.
Source: The European Journal of Health Economics - November 14, 2021 Category: Health Management Source Type: research

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Aortic Valve Bypass
Conclusions TAVR and AVB relieve aortic stenosis and have similar and acceptable procedural mortality rates. AVB-treated patients had 1.75 times the STS risk score when compared with the TAVR cohort. Hospital charges for TAVR were nearly twofold those of AVB. Hospital reimbursement was similar, but AVB had two to four times the profit margin of TAVR. Longer follow-up for the TAVR cohort will determine whether survival is comparable to that after AVB at 3 and 5 years.
Source: The Annals of Thoracic Surgery - September 12, 2015 Category: Cardiovascular & Thoracic Surgery Source Type: research

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Aortic Valve Bypass: A Comparison of Outcomes and Economics.
CONCLUSIONS: TAVR and AVB relieve aortic stenosis and have similar and acceptable procedural mortality rates. AVB-treated patients had 1.75 times the STS risk score when compared with the TAVR cohort. Hospital charges for TAVR were nearly twofold those of AVB. Hospital reimbursement was similar, but AVB had two to four times the profit margin of TAVR. Longer follow-up for the TAVR cohort will determine whether survival is comparable to that after AVB at 3 and 5 years. PMID: 26365675 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Source: The Annals of Thoracic Surgery - September 11, 2015 Category: Cardiovascular & Thoracic Surgery Authors: Brown JW, Boyd JH, Patel PM, Baker ML, Syed A, Ladowski J, Corvera J Tags: Ann Thorac Surg Source Type: research