Does it matter who harmed whom? A cross-cultural study of moral judgments about harm by and to insiders and outsiders
Curr Psychol. 2024;43(9):7997-8007. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04986-3. Epub 2023 Jul 22.ABSTRACTThis cross-cultural study compared judgments of moral wrongness for physical and emotional harm with varying combinations of in-group vs. out-group agents and victims across six countries: the United States of America (N = 937), the United Kingdom (N = 995), Romania (N = 782), Brazil (N = 856), South Korea (N = 1776), and China (N = 1008). Consistent with our hypothesis we found evidence of an insider agent effect, where moral violations committed by outsider agents are generally considered more morally wrong than the same violati...
Source: Current Psychology - March 29, 2024 Category: Psychiatry & Psychology Authors: Paul McKee Hyo-Eun Kim Honghong Tang Jim A C Everett Vladimir Chituc Toni Gibea Lucas Murrins Marques Paulo Boggio Walter Sinnott-Armstrong Source Type: research
Does it matter who harmed whom? A cross-cultural study of moral judgments about harm by and to insiders and outsiders
Curr Psychol. 2024;43(9):7997-8007. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04986-3. Epub 2023 Jul 22.ABSTRACTThis cross-cultural study compared judgments of moral wrongness for physical and emotional harm with varying combinations of in-group vs. out-group agents and victims across six countries: the United States of America (N = 937), the United Kingdom (N = 995), Romania (N = 782), Brazil (N = 856), South Korea (N = 1776), and China (N = 1008). Consistent with our hypothesis we found evidence of an insider agent effect, where moral violations committed by outsider agents are generally considered more morally wrong than the same violati...
Source: Current Psychology - March 29, 2024 Category: Psychiatry & Psychology Authors: Paul McKee Hyo-Eun Kim Honghong Tang Jim A C Everett Vladimir Chituc Toni Gibea Lucas Murrins Marques Paulo Boggio Walter Sinnott-Armstrong Source Type: research
Does it matter who harmed whom? A cross-cultural study of moral judgments about harm by and to insiders and outsiders
Curr Psychol. 2024;43(9):7997-8007. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04986-3. Epub 2023 Jul 22.ABSTRACTThis cross-cultural study compared judgments of moral wrongness for physical and emotional harm with varying combinations of in-group vs. out-group agents and victims across six countries: the United States of America (N = 937), the United Kingdom (N = 995), Romania (N = 782), Brazil (N = 856), South Korea (N = 1776), and China (N = 1008). Consistent with our hypothesis we found evidence of an insider agent effect, where moral violations committed by outsider agents are generally considered more morally wrong than the same violati...
Source: Current Psychology - March 29, 2024 Category: Psychiatry & Psychology Authors: Paul McKee Hyo-Eun Kim Honghong Tang Jim A C Everett Vladimir Chituc Toni Gibea Lucas Murrins Marques Paulo Boggio Walter Sinnott-Armstrong Source Type: research
Does it matter who harmed whom? A cross-cultural study of moral judgments about harm by and to insiders and outsiders
Curr Psychol. 2024;43(9):7997-8007. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04986-3. Epub 2023 Jul 22.ABSTRACTThis cross-cultural study compared judgments of moral wrongness for physical and emotional harm with varying combinations of in-group vs. out-group agents and victims across six countries: the United States of America (N = 937), the United Kingdom (N = 995), Romania (N = 782), Brazil (N = 856), South Korea (N = 1776), and China (N = 1008). Consistent with our hypothesis we found evidence of an insider agent effect, where moral violations committed by outsider agents are generally considered more morally wrong than the same violati...
Source: Current Psychology - March 29, 2024 Category: Psychiatry & Psychology Authors: Paul McKee Hyo-Eun Kim Honghong Tang Jim A C Everett Vladimir Chituc Toni Gibea Lucas Murrins Marques Paulo Boggio Walter Sinnott-Armstrong Source Type: research
Does it matter who harmed whom? A cross-cultural study of moral judgments about harm by and to insiders and outsiders
Curr Psychol. 2024;43(9):7997-8007. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04986-3. Epub 2023 Jul 22.ABSTRACTThis cross-cultural study compared judgments of moral wrongness for physical and emotional harm with varying combinations of in-group vs. out-group agents and victims across six countries: the United States of America (N = 937), the United Kingdom (N = 995), Romania (N = 782), Brazil (N = 856), South Korea (N = 1776), and China (N = 1008). Consistent with our hypothesis we found evidence of an insider agent effect, where moral violations committed by outsider agents are generally considered more morally wrong than the same violati...
Source: Current Psychology - March 29, 2024 Category: Psychiatry & Psychology Authors: Paul McKee Hyo-Eun Kim Honghong Tang Jim A C Everett Vladimir Chituc Toni Gibea Lucas Murrins Marques Paulo Boggio Walter Sinnott-Armstrong Source Type: research
Does it matter who harmed whom? A cross-cultural study of moral judgments about harm by and to insiders and outsiders
Curr Psychol. 2024;43(9):7997-8007. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04986-3. Epub 2023 Jul 22.ABSTRACTThis cross-cultural study compared judgments of moral wrongness for physical and emotional harm with varying combinations of in-group vs. out-group agents and victims across six countries: the United States of America (N = 937), the United Kingdom (N = 995), Romania (N = 782), Brazil (N = 856), South Korea (N = 1776), and China (N = 1008). Consistent with our hypothesis we found evidence of an insider agent effect, where moral violations committed by outsider agents are generally considered more morally wrong than the same violati...
Source: Current Psychology - March 29, 2024 Category: Psychiatry & Psychology Authors: Paul McKee Hyo-Eun Kim Honghong Tang Jim A C Everett Vladimir Chituc Toni Gibea Lucas Murrins Marques Paulo Boggio Walter Sinnott-Armstrong Source Type: research
Does it matter who harmed whom? A cross-cultural study of moral judgments about harm by and to insiders and outsiders
Curr Psychol. 2024;43(9):7997-8007. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04986-3. Epub 2023 Jul 22.ABSTRACTThis cross-cultural study compared judgments of moral wrongness for physical and emotional harm with varying combinations of in-group vs. out-group agents and victims across six countries: the United States of America (N = 937), the United Kingdom (N = 995), Romania (N = 782), Brazil (N = 856), South Korea (N = 1776), and China (N = 1008). Consistent with our hypothesis we found evidence of an insider agent effect, where moral violations committed by outsider agents are generally considered more morally wrong than the same violati...
Source: Current Psychology - March 29, 2024 Category: Psychiatry & Psychology Authors: Paul McKee Hyo-Eun Kim Honghong Tang Jim A C Everett Vladimir Chituc Toni Gibea Lucas Murrins Marques Paulo Boggio Walter Sinnott-Armstrong Source Type: research
Does it matter who harmed whom? A cross-cultural study of moral judgments about harm by and to insiders and outsiders
Curr Psychol. 2024;43(9):7997-8007. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04986-3. Epub 2023 Jul 22.ABSTRACTThis cross-cultural study compared judgments of moral wrongness for physical and emotional harm with varying combinations of in-group vs. out-group agents and victims across six countries: the United States of America (N = 937), the United Kingdom (N = 995), Romania (N = 782), Brazil (N = 856), South Korea (N = 1776), and China (N = 1008). Consistent with our hypothesis we found evidence of an insider agent effect, where moral violations committed by outsider agents are generally considered more morally wrong than the same violati...
Source: Current Psychology - March 29, 2024 Category: Psychiatry & Psychology Authors: Paul McKee Hyo-Eun Kim Honghong Tang Jim A C Everett Vladimir Chituc Toni Gibea Lucas Murrins Marques Paulo Boggio Walter Sinnott-Armstrong Source Type: research
Does it matter who harmed whom? A cross-cultural study of moral judgments about harm by and to insiders and outsiders
Curr Psychol. 2024;43(9):7997-8007. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04986-3. Epub 2023 Jul 22.ABSTRACTThis cross-cultural study compared judgments of moral wrongness for physical and emotional harm with varying combinations of in-group vs. out-group agents and victims across six countries: the United States of America (N = 937), the United Kingdom (N = 995), Romania (N = 782), Brazil (N = 856), South Korea (N = 1776), and China (N = 1008). Consistent with our hypothesis we found evidence of an insider agent effect, where moral violations committed by outsider agents are generally considered more morally wrong than the same violati...
Source: Current Psychology - March 29, 2024 Category: Psychiatry & Psychology Authors: Paul McKee Hyo-Eun Kim Honghong Tang Jim A C Everett Vladimir Chituc Toni Gibea Lucas Murrins Marques Paulo Boggio Walter Sinnott-Armstrong Source Type: research
Does it matter who harmed whom? A cross-cultural study of moral judgments about harm by and to insiders and outsiders
Curr Psychol. 2024;43(9):7997-8007. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04986-3. Epub 2023 Jul 22.ABSTRACTThis cross-cultural study compared judgments of moral wrongness for physical and emotional harm with varying combinations of in-group vs. out-group agents and victims across six countries: the United States of America (N = 937), the United Kingdom (N = 995), Romania (N = 782), Brazil (N = 856), South Korea (N = 1776), and China (N = 1008). Consistent with our hypothesis we found evidence of an insider agent effect, where moral violations committed by outsider agents are generally considered more morally wrong than the same violati...
Source: Current Psychology - March 29, 2024 Category: Psychiatry & Psychology Authors: Paul McKee Hyo-Eun Kim Honghong Tang Jim A C Everett Vladimir Chituc Toni Gibea Lucas Murrins Marques Paulo Boggio Walter Sinnott-Armstrong Source Type: research
Does it matter who harmed whom? A cross-cultural study of moral judgments about harm by and to insiders and outsiders
Curr Psychol. 2024;43(9):7997-8007. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04986-3. Epub 2023 Jul 22.ABSTRACTThis cross-cultural study compared judgments of moral wrongness for physical and emotional harm with varying combinations of in-group vs. out-group agents and victims across six countries: the United States of America (N = 937), the United Kingdom (N = 995), Romania (N = 782), Brazil (N = 856), South Korea (N = 1776), and China (N = 1008). Consistent with our hypothesis we found evidence of an insider agent effect, where moral violations committed by outsider agents are generally considered more morally wrong than the same violati...
Source: Current Psychology - March 29, 2024 Category: Psychiatry & Psychology Authors: Paul McKee Hyo-Eun Kim Honghong Tang Jim A C Everett Vladimir Chituc Toni Gibea Lucas Murrins Marques Paulo Boggio Walter Sinnott-Armstrong Source Type: research
Does it matter who harmed whom? A cross-cultural study of moral judgments about harm by and to insiders and outsiders
Curr Psychol. 2024;43(9):7997-8007. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04986-3. Epub 2023 Jul 22.ABSTRACTThis cross-cultural study compared judgments of moral wrongness for physical and emotional harm with varying combinations of in-group vs. out-group agents and victims across six countries: the United States of America (N = 937), the United Kingdom (N = 995), Romania (N = 782), Brazil (N = 856), South Korea (N = 1776), and China (N = 1008). Consistent with our hypothesis we found evidence of an insider agent effect, where moral violations committed by outsider agents are generally considered more morally wrong than the same violati...
Source: Current Psychology - March 29, 2024 Category: Psychiatry & Psychology Authors: Paul McKee Hyo-Eun Kim Honghong Tang Jim A C Everett Vladimir Chituc Toni Gibea Lucas Murrins Marques Paulo Boggio Walter Sinnott-Armstrong Source Type: research
Does it matter who harmed whom? A cross-cultural study of moral judgments about harm by and to insiders and outsiders
Curr Psychol. 2024;43(9):7997-8007. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04986-3. Epub 2023 Jul 22.ABSTRACTThis cross-cultural study compared judgments of moral wrongness for physical and emotional harm with varying combinations of in-group vs. out-group agents and victims across six countries: the United States of America (N = 937), the United Kingdom (N = 995), Romania (N = 782), Brazil (N = 856), South Korea (N = 1776), and China (N = 1008). Consistent with our hypothesis we found evidence of an insider agent effect, where moral violations committed by outsider agents are generally considered more morally wrong than the same violati...
Source: Current Psychology - March 29, 2024 Category: Psychiatry & Psychology Authors: Paul McKee Hyo-Eun Kim Honghong Tang Jim A C Everett Vladimir Chituc Toni Gibea Lucas Murrins Marques Paulo Boggio Walter Sinnott-Armstrong Source Type: research
Does it matter who harmed whom? A cross-cultural study of moral judgments about harm by and to insiders and outsiders
Curr Psychol. 2024;43(9):7997-8007. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04986-3. Epub 2023 Jul 22.ABSTRACTThis cross-cultural study compared judgments of moral wrongness for physical and emotional harm with varying combinations of in-group vs. out-group agents and victims across six countries: the United States of America (N = 937), the United Kingdom (N = 995), Romania (N = 782), Brazil (N = 856), South Korea (N = 1776), and China (N = 1008). Consistent with our hypothesis we found evidence of an insider agent effect, where moral violations committed by outsider agents are generally considered more morally wrong than the same violati...
Source: Current Psychology - March 29, 2024 Category: Psychiatry & Psychology Authors: Paul McKee Hyo-Eun Kim Honghong Tang Jim A C Everett Vladimir Chituc Toni Gibea Lucas Murrins Marques Paulo Boggio Walter Sinnott-Armstrong Source Type: research
The reinforcement sensitivity theory affects questionnaire (RST-AQ). A validation study of a new scale targeting affects related to anxiety, approach motivation and fear
Curr Psychol. 2024;43(6):5193-5205. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04623-z. Epub 2023 May 9.ABSTRACTThis paper presents the RST-AQ, a 22-item scale to measure the affective states related to the three motivational systems postulated by Reinforcement Sensitivity theory (RST-AQ): the Behavioral approach system (BAS), Behavioral inhibition system (BIS), and the Fight-Flight-Freeze system (FFFS). The three subscales are internally consistent. Results show an overall support for construct validity of our RST-AQ measure. The correlations of the RST-AQ subscales with other measures demonstrate a good convergent and divergent validity wi...
Source: Current Psychology - March 25, 2024 Category: Psychiatry & Psychology Authors: Vittoria Franchina Johannes Klackl Eva Jonas Source Type: research
