Motivation versus aversive processing during perception.
Reward facilitates performance and boosts cognitive performance across many tasks. At the same time, negative affective stimuli interfere with performance when they are not relevant to the task at hand. Yet, the investigation of how reward and negative stimuli impact perception and cognition has taken place in a manner that is largely independent of each other. How reward and negative emotion simultaneously contribute to behavioral performance is currently poorly understood. The aim of the present study was to investigate how the simultaneous manipulation of positive motivational processing (here manipulated via reward) and aversive processing (here manipulated via negative picture viewing) influence behavior during a perceptual task. We tested 2 competing hypotheses about the impact of reward on negative picture viewing. On the one hand, suggestions about the automaticity of emotional processing predict that negative picture interference would be relatively immune to reward. On the other, if affective visual processing is not obligatory, as we have argued in the past, reward may counteract the deleterious effect of more potent negative pictures. We found that reward counteracted the effect of potent, negative distracters during a visual discrimination task. Thus, when sufficiently motivated, participants were able to reduce the deleterious impact of bodily mutilation stimuli. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved)
Mandatory mask-wearing in shops and transport reimposed in England;Anthony Fauci says new variant is probably already in the US;Australia scrambles to prevent outbreakJohnson ignored my plan to deal with new variants – ex-officialOmicron ’s worst impact will be in nations with low vaccination ratesWhat do we know about the new ‘worst ever’ Covid variant?See all our coronavirus coverageAustralian states and territories are braced for the spread of Omicron, with authorities conceding on Sunday that positive cases were inevitable.Both the NSW and Victorian governments have introduced 72-hour isolation ...
GPA/sGPA: 3.8 MCAT: 522 (131/129/131/131) TX resident ORM Male TX public school, CS Major ~150 clinical, 150 non clinical volunteering ~600 hours research, 1 pub 1 poster. Doing full-time industry R&D program this summer so ~400 hrs more expected 50 hours FM/pediatrics shadowing TA and online CS instructor experience School scholarship and research awards FAP recipient I've been seeing lots of posts about high stat applicants having trouble this... Read more
Hey there! My wife is interested in moving to Colorado to be near her sister after residency. We’re currently in Michigan. I’ve heard that Colorado is quite competitive to get into. Is there truth to this statement? Is it possible to break into the family medicine job market there?
A correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02414-8
ConclusionExplicit criteria for prioritization in the waiting lists may be the consumption of analgesics for patients with incisional/ventral hernia and frailty for patients with inguinal hernia. A reasonable approach seems to establish separate waiting lists for incisional/ventral hernia and inguinal hernia repair.
ConclusionThe e-TEP-RS technique for large, complex, midline, ventral abdominal hernias can be used with excellent results and acceptable morbidity. This technique is technically challenging and should be mastered in relatively smaller ventral hernias to achieve good results before attempting it in larger, complex ones.