The problems with polarity frames in occupational therapy theory

There is nothing quite like starting off a Monday morning with a good theory article.  I opened up my Twitter feed to find a link to Taff& Putnam ' s contribution entitled " Northern philosophies and professional neocolonialism in occupational therapy: A historical review and critique. "The authors " suggest with confidence that the current American philosophical landscape in 2021 is a mix of mostly analytic philosophy accompanied by a smaller measure of neopragmatism predisposed to a Continental mindset. " (Taff& Putnam, 2022).  I am uncertain if this is a view shared by all, and to any degree that it is true, this perspective does not respect an entire heritage of thinking that has been adopted into the American perspective generally and by occupational therapy practitioners specifically.The fact that many occupational therapy practitioners in the United States continue to frame their practice around core American values is a topic that is important to explore.  Claiming that a paradigm change is needed to address extra-contextual beliefs represents the logical fallacy of begging a question.  Is it possible that there is no paradigm crisis, at least from the perspective of American occupational therapy practitioners?  Change can be interpreted as problematic or evolutionary, depending on perspective.  Paradigms change over time to reflect new theories.  However, when new theories disrupt everything that is previously known or are i...
Source: ABC Therapeutics Occupational Therapy Weblog - Category: Occupational Health Source Type: blogs