What to use instead of NICE Evidence Search - a first thought

I have been promoting NICE Evidence Search much more systematically this year to " my " first year undergraduates in their first library session.  It is also on the resource lists I ' ve made for each of their courses.  I like the idea that there is one source, where all the results have been evaluated by health information professionals, and I ' ve suggested it ' s a good first place to search for any health topic.  But NICE Evidence Search is closing at the end of March 2022.  So what to use instead?NICE Evidence Search has two lists of sources, one of sites where some of the content is ingested automatically, another of sources which are searched manually.  The lists include national NHS sources, NICE, SIGN, a large number of charities, government bodies and more.  I had thought it included individual NHS trusts but I am not sure it does.  So what does NICE Evidence Search find, and what can be found elsewhere?  I searched NICE Evidence Search for vertigo epley to find things about the Epley Manoeuvre being used with people with vertigo.  There were 27 results, which I exported to EndNote.There were:Systemic reviews from DARE - 5Systematic reviews from PubMed - 4Cochrane reviews - 2BestBets - 2CKS - 2 (one entry is part of the other)Patient.info - 2Brain and Spine Foundation - 2British Society of Audiology - 2NICE guidelines - 1Royal National Institute for Deaf People - 1Royal Australian C...
Source: Browsing - Category: Databases & Libraries Tags: NICE Evidence Search Source Type: blogs