Literature review and meta-analysis of gastric and intestinal bioaccessibility for nine inorganic elements in soils and soil-like media for use in human health risk assessment

Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2022 Jan 26;240:113929. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2022.113929. Online ahead of print.ABSTRACTWhen soils become contaminated, a human health risk assessment (HHRA) is beneficial for determining whether identified contaminants of potential concern (COPCs) pose a risk to human health. In certain jurisdictions, when calculating doses from soil ingestion during the exposure assessment step of a HHRA, validated bioaccessibility methods may be used to accurately represent a contaminant's relative absorption factor (RAF). Where validated methods do not exist, risk assessors must either a) conduct their own literature search (which can be time consuming), b) create their own validation study (also a time consuming process), or c) use default assumptions (i.e., a RAF of 1). This literature search and meta-analysis characterizes the past 28 years of published analysis for aluminum (Al), antimony (Sb), arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), iron (Fe), lead (Pb), manganese (Mn), and mercury (Hg) from 13 different gastric and intestinal bioaccessibility methodologies. These elements were selected as they are often risk drivers in HHRAs and are sometimes identified as COPCs in HHRAs at contaminated sites. Results were compiled from soil deriving from a variety of sources and varying in physicochemical properties. The mean percent bioaccessibility and 95 percent upper confidence limit on the mean (95 UCL) were calculated to better inform further study and validation ...
Source: International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental health - Category: Environmental Health Authors: Source Type: research