Lacan and ferenczi: paradoxical kinship?(*).
Lacan and ferenczi: paradoxical kinship?(*). Am J Psychoanal. 2015 Mar;75(1):86-93 Authors: Lugrin Y Abstract The kinship between Ferenczi and Lacan can be compared with the phases of an eclipse. Throughout the first period of his teaching, Lacan presents Ferenczi as the most relevant analyst among the first pioneers. It is clear that he hopes to develop Ferenczi's subversive reflections about clinical practice. Surprisingly, in the second period references to Ferenczi seem to disappear, even when he takes on the question of trauma in light of what he calls the register of the Real; he does not cite Ferenczi at all. In a third period, after Lacan's death, certain Lacanians are very critical about Ferenczi, often excessively. Today, analysts open to Lacan's teaching are discovering Ferenczi and the richness of his work, in which Lacan found numerous springheads for his own work. PMID: 25720786 [PubMed - in process]
Authors: Westwood S Abstract With increasing visibility of older lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans (LGBT) people, there is an urgent need to understand abuse in their lives. This is an under-researched area, which this scoping study (based on a literature review and a small subset of data taken from a larger project) serves to demonstrate. The content of this article formed the basis of a paper presented at a workshop on 'LGBT Elder Abuse' held at Keele University(UK) in 2017, convened and chaired by the author. It considers LGBT elder abuse in terms of polyvictimisation, intersectionality and the abuse of power. Th...
Authors: Lhermite A, Munoz Sastre MT, Sorum PC, Mullet E Abstract The views of laypeople and professionals (nurses, occupational therapists, psychologists, and physicians) on the capacity to make informed decisions of elderly people with depression or dementia were examined. Participants were presented with vignettes created by varying the levels of three factors: (a) the type of decision (e.g., agreeing to surgery), (b) the health problem (e.g., slight depression), and (c) the availability of social support. Through cluster analysis, four different positions were found. Seventeen percent of the participants consid...
CONCLUSION:: Reasons for DRF are multifactorial. Preventive strategies with an emphasis on environmental and behavioural factor modifications are likely to decrease the number of DRF. PMID: 30452300 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Øyvind Gløersen, Thomas Losnegard, Anders Malthe-Sørenssen, Dag Kristian Dysthe, Matthias Gilgien
Thiago Montes Fidale, Hanna Karen Moreira Antunes, Leonardo Roever, Alexandre Gon çalves, Guilherme Morais Puga, Romeu Paulo Martins Silva, Fernando Nazário de Resende, Fernanda Rodrigues de Souza, Beatriz Montes Fidale, Frederico Balbino Lizardo, Elmiro Santos Resende
Mohamed M. Refaey, Dapeng Li
Rong Jiahuan, Su Wenhao, Guan Xiaofan, Shi Wei, Zha Shanjie, He Maolong, Wang Haifeng, Liu Guangxu
Maria Bogdanova, Aleksandra Kostina, Katarina Zihlavnikova Enayati, Arsenii Zabirnyk, Anna Malashicheva, K åre-Olav Stensløkken, Gareth John Sullivan, Mari-Liis Kaljusto, John-Peder Escobar Kvitting, Anna Kostareva, Jarle Vaage, Arkady Rutkovskiy
Isabella dos Santos Alves, Carlos Augusto Kalva-Filho, Rodrigo Aquino, Leonardo Travitzki, Alessandro Tosim, Marcelo Papoti, M árcio Pereira Morato
Ma ëlle Wirth, Aurélie Naud, Emmanuelle Schmitt, Isabelle Clerc-Urmès, Jean-Michel Hascoët