Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions

CONCLUSIONS: We found that there were no serious adverse events reported when using a circumcision device compared to standard surgical techniques, but they may slightly increase moderate adverse effects, and it is unclear whether there is a difference in mild adverse effects. Use of circumcision devices probably reduces the time of the procedure by about 17 minutes, a clinically meaningful time saving. For patients, use of the circumcision device may result in lower pain scores during the first 24 hours and patients may be slightly more satisfied with it compared with standard surgical techniques. Clinicians, patients and policymakers can use these results in conjunction with their own contextual factors to inform the approach that best suits their healthcare settings. High-quality trials evaluating this intervention are needed to provide further certainty regarding the rates of adverse effects and postoperative pain of using devices compared to standard approaches.PMID:33786810 | DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD012250.pub2

Source: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews - March 31, 2021 Category: General Medicine Authors: Ameer Hohlfeld Sumayyah Ebrahim Muhammed Zaki Shaik Tamara Kredo Source Type: research