Peer review analysis in the field of radiation oncology: results from a  web-based survey of the Young DEGRO working group

ConclusionThe scientific content of the manuscript, reputation of the journal and a  high IF determine the attractiveness for peer reviewing in the field of radiation oncology. The majority of participants prefer a double-blind peer review process and would conduct more reviews if compensation was available. Free access to journal articles, discounts for publication costs or cong ress fees, or an expense allowance were identified to increase attractiveness of the review process.
Source: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie - Category: Cancer & Oncology Source Type: research