Comparative Effectiveness of Standard Care With IV Thrombolysis Versus Without IV Thrombolysis for Mild Ischemic Stroke [Stroke]
Conclusions
In this observational registry-based study, standard care with IVT is more effective than not receiving IVT in mild ischemic stroke patients, and there is a statistically nonsignificant risk of symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation.
Source: JAHA:Journal of the American Heart Association - Category: Cardiology Authors: Choi, J. C., Jang, M. U., Kang, K., Park, J.-M., Ko, Y., Lee, S.-J., Cha, J.-K., Kim, D.-H., Park, S. S., Park, T. H., Lee, K. B., Lee, J., Kim, J.-T., Cho, K.-H., Yu, K.-H., Oh, M.-S., Lee, B.-C., Cho, Y.-J., Kim, D.-E., Lee, J. S., Lee, J., Gorelick, P. Tags: Stroke Source Type: research
More News: Cardiology | Databases & Libraries | Heart | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Ischemic Stroke | Statistics | Stroke | Study