Prediction of Lethal Arrhythmic Events Through Remote Monitoring Using Heart Rate Variability Analysis in Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator.

The objective was to identify the predictors of lethal arrhythmic events (VT/VF).Thirty-three patients (mean age: 50 years) with ICDs [with functionality of heart rate variability (HRV) analysis] were divided into two groups [VT/VF (+), VT/VF (-) ]. Clinical, device (ventricular lead impedance; amplitude of ventricular electrogram), and HRV data were compared between the two groups. The NN interval-index (SDNNi) was calculated for every 5 minutes, and the mean, maximum, minimum, and standard deviation of SDNNi during the 24-hour period were used.During the observation period of 13 ± 10 months, 10 patients experienced VT/VF events. Total mean, max, and min SDNNi were higher in the VT/VF (+) than the VT/VF (-) group (132.9 ± 9.3 versus 93.5 ± 6.1, P = 0.0013; 214.6 ± 10.6 versus 167.0 ± 7.0, P = 0.0007; 71.2 ± 7.5 versus 43.9 ± 4.9, P = 0.0047). On logistic regression analysis, a total mean SDNNi of 100.1, max SDNNi of 185.0 and min SDNNi of 52.0 as cut-off values for prediction of a VT/VF event demonstrated significant receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC = 0.86, P = 0.0007; AUC = 0.84, P = 0.0005; AUC = 0.78, P = 0.0030). The max ΔSDNNi, i.e., difference from baseline SDNNi, and min ΔSDNNi in 7 and 28 days preceding VT/VF events were significant predictors of VT/VF events.Time-domain HRV analysis through a RM system may help identify patients at high risk of lethal arrhythmic events; in addition, it may help predict the occurrence of lethal arrhythmic ...

Source: International Heart Journal - September 5, 2020 Category: Cardiology Tags: Int Heart J Source Type: research