An Illustrative Case of Suicidal Hanging Versus Accidental Hanging Associated With Autoerotic Activity: Necessary Medicolegal Death Investigation and Role of Cognitive Bias

The majority of hanging deaths are relatively straightforward when opining the manner of death, typically determined to be suicide. However, there are rare hanging deaths that require the forensic pathologist to seek additional information. Forensic pathologists commonly consider an accidental manner of death when the hanging death scene includes evidence of solitary sexual activity consistent with autoerotic asphyxia. Here, the authors present a case of an initially apparent suicidal hanging where important death scene details photographed by the medical examiner investigator and history provided by family members during subsequent conversations ultimately helped the forensic pathologist conclude an opinion that the hanging was accidental, likely due to autoerotic activity. The decedent, who hanged himself in the closet of his bedroom, was wearing shorts that were initially believed to be inadvertently torn; however, further investigation revealed his shorts were intentionally modified to expose his genitalia. Additional evidence documented from the death scene photographs and conversations with his mother revealed items and activities consistent with autoerotic behavior. Before opining a manner of death in hanging deaths, forensic pathologists are encouraged to consider details beyond that obtained from the initial death scene investigation and postmortem examination. A thorough medicolegal death investigation should not be viewed as introducing cognitive bias, but rather a...
Source: The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology - Category: Forensic Medicine Tags: Case Reports Source Type: research