Replacing the refinement for skin sensitization testing: Considerations to the implementation of adverse outcome pathway (AOP)-based defined approaches (DA) in OECD guidelines.

Replacing the refinement for skin sensitization testing: Considerations to the implementation of adverse outcome pathway (AOP)-based defined approaches (DA) in OECD guidelines. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020 Jun 17;:104713 Authors: Kolle SN, Landsiedel R, Natsch A Abstract While single non-animal methods have been adopted in OECD test guidelines, combinations of methods (so called defined approaches, DA) are not. Hardly any animal study can be replaced by a single non-animal method, rather DA are needed. The OECD published the Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) on skin sensitization in 2012 and is currently discussing the implementation of DA into a guideline. Obviously, it takes thorough considerations and evaluations to validate such DA. Currently we see four preconditions for a proper and expedient implementation of DA in a guideline: (i) The reference data should be selected to allow meaningful evaluations and must not replicate the limitations of the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) (ii) Methods and prediction models should be validated before they are used in an OECD-adopted DA, (iii) An OECD-adopted DA should follow the respective AOP and (iv) acknowledge regulatory needs and successful toxicological practice. These points still need to be considered in the current discussion at the OECD. A guideline for skin sensitization DA is setting the scene for regulatory acceptance of all new approaches (for any toxicological endpoint) in...
Source: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology : RTP - Category: Toxicology Authors: Tags: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol Source Type: research