Visual and quantitative evaluation of [ 18 F]FES and [ 18 F]FDHT PET in patients with metastatic breast cancer: an interobserver variability study

ConclusionVisual and quantitative evaluation of [18F]FES PET showed high interobserver agreement. These results support the use of [18F]FES PET in clinical practice. In contrast, visual agreement for [18F]FDHT PET was relatively low due to low tumour-background ratios, but quantitative agreement was good. This underscores the relevance of quantitative analysis of [18F]FDHT PET in breast cancer.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01988324. Registered 20 November 2013,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01988324?term=FDHT+PET&draw=1&rank=2.
Source: EJNMMI Research - Category: Radiology Source Type: research