Keratoconus Characteristics Used in Randomized Trials of Surgical Interventions—A Systematic Review

Conclusions: The evidence from randomized trials, even after introduction of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement, remains ill-formed regarding a careful definition of keratoconus. This is unfortunate because imprecisions regarding the specification of included patients preclude clinicians to assess applicability, that is, the extent to which they can use inferences drawn from study participants regarding efficacy and adverse events in the care of individual patients.
Source: Cornea - Category: Opthalmology Tags: Clinical Science Source Type: research