Two year adverse outcomes of the magnetic levitated centrifugal continuous flow circulatory pump versus the axial continuous-flow pump for advanced heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Conclusions: At a follow-up time period of 2 years, pump replacement was significantly higher with the axial continuous-flow pump in comparison to the magnetic levitated centrifugal continuous flow circulatory pump. However, no significant difference was observed with the other adverse outcomes.
Source: Medicine - Category: Internal Medicine Tags: Research Article: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Source Type: research