Race-based biases in judgments of social pain

Publication date: May 2020Source: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Volume 88Author(s): Jason C. Deska, Jonathan Kunstman, E. Paige Lloyd, Steven M. Almaraz, Michael J. Bernstein, J.P. Gonzales, Kurt HugenbergAbstractSix studies tested the hypothesis that evaluators judge Black people less sensitive to social pain than White people. Social pain was operationalized as the psychological distress caused by experiences that damage social worth and interpersonal relationships (e.g., derogation, exclusion, unfairness). White evaluators judged both Black male (Studies 1, 2a, & 2b) and female (Studies 2a & 2b) targets as experiencing less social pain than White male and female targets. Study 3 provided evidence that this bias also extends to Black evaluators. Further, the belief that Black people are less sensitive to social pain than White people was mediated by judgments of differential life hardship experienced by Black and White targets (Study 4) and did not seem to be a subset of a broader tendency to judge Black targets as generally insensate (Study 5). Critically, the observed race-based social pain bias also translated into beliefs that Black targets needed fewer supportive resources than White targets to cope with socially painful events (Study 6). The current research demonstrates that there are racial biases in judgments of others' psychological distress and these biases inform social support judgments for those in need.

Source: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology - February 15, 2020 Category: Psychiatry & Psychology Source Type: research