More systematic reviews were registered in PROSPERO each year, but few records' status was up-to-date

To determine the proportion of systematic reviews (SRs) registered in PROSPERO and explore differences between publication years, review focus, and country. Secondary objectives were (1) to compare the characteristics of registered and nonregistered SRs and (2) to assess the up-to-dateness of the PROSPERO records' status.

Source: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology - October 3, 2019 Category: Epidemiology Authors: Tanja Rombey, Katharina Doni, Falk Hoffmann, Dawid Pieper, Katharina Allers Tags: Original Article Source Type: research