Consideration of confounding was suboptimal in the reporting of observational studies in psychiatry: a meta-epidemiological study
When reporting observational studies, authors should explicitly discuss the potential for confounding and other biases but it is unclear to what extent this is done within the psychiatric field.
Source: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology - Category: Epidemiology Authors: Klaus Munkholm, Maria Faurholt-Jepsen, John P.A. Ioannidis, Lars G. Hemkens Tags: Original Article Source Type: research